'It's a Warning to Everyone' – City Partners Share Shock Over Trainee Signature Forgery
The ex-trainee was fined and can no longer work as a solicitor after tracing a client's signature on a document.
June 07, 2019 at 09:04 AM
4 minute read
"She's overstepped the mark badly," was one partner's response to the Solicitors Regulation Authority's (SRA) decision that a former trainee at Ropes & Gray's London office traced a client's signature.
In the wake of the news, which was published on the SRA's website yesterday, partners across the City have expressed shock.
"It's a warning to everyone," said the same partner, who works in the London office of a global firm. "The reason people don't do this is because if you do it once, you lose your career. I've never even heard it suggested. It's one step away from taking client money. It's that kind of level. It's a once-in-20-year event."
However, while partners were quick to say that the SRA's decision to bar the trainee and fine her £2,000 was fair and that this was a particularly reprehensible act on her part, some pointed out that the level of competition between trainees and junior lawyers and the desire to impress senior colleagues and clients can tempt some to do things they otherwise wouldn't.
New guidance was issued in 2009 about the virtual signing of documents, following the Mercury case in which a judge decided that adding a signature page to a deed or using a signature page from a previous draft of the deed in a final draft would not be valid.
That guidance paved the way for lawyers to assess the boundaries of what is and what is not allowed when it comes to getting clients to provide their signatures at short notice.
Partners pointed out, however, that trainees would likely be unfamiliar with any such guidance and it would be up to firms to inform trainees of the mistakes that can be made in this area.
One Magic Circle partner said that in the run-up to a deal being closed, the team can get manic and key documents can get lost, as was the case for the trainee in question.
"The fact is you'll often have people who have not slept recently, some of the documents may not be in the agreed form yet, and you've got junior team members who are under pressure and who want to impress their superiors and the clients, so you do have this environment where people do something stupid like this."
The partner at the global firm added: "You can always fix these things. You can say, 'look, I've misplaced this'; it might create a small amount of aggro but normally people are pretty good about this. People say: 'Look, I'm not available right now, but I'll do it when I get back to the office.'"
One partner at a U.S. firm in the City said this would be a difficult thing for an inexperienced person to own up to, given their desire to impress superiors who hold their career as a lawyer in their hands.
"It's quite sad in a way. There is a lot of pride involved in being a lawyer, especially at a young age where there's a lot of pressure to get qualification. It's sad to see trainees to do something like this. I don't know whether there should have been better supervision.
"We absolutely all make mistakes – we just all need to be upfront about this stuff. Maybe this will open up more discussions about this kind of thing at an early stage with trainees," the partner added.
A Ropes & Gray spokesperson said: "This is an SRA matter and, as such, it would be inappropriate for us to comment. We can confirm that [the trainee] no longer works at the firm."
Legal Week was unable to reach the trainee for comment.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllWill a Market Dominated by Small- to Mid-Cap Deals Give Rise to This Dark Horse US Firm in China?
Big Law Sidelined as Asian IPOs in New York Dominated by Small Cap Listings
X-odus: Why Germany’s Federal Court of Justice and Others Are Leaving X
Mexican Lawyers On Speed-Dial as Trump Floats ‘Day One’ Tariffs
Trending Stories
- 1No Two Wildfires Alike: Lawyers Take Different Legal Strategies in California
- 2Poop-Themed Dog Toy OK as Parody, but Still Tarnished Jack Daniel’s Brand, Court Says
- 3Meet the New President of NY's Association of Trial Court Jurists
- 4Lawyers' Phones Are Ringing: What Should Employers Do If ICE Raids Their Business?
- 5Freshfields Hires Ex-SEC Corporate Finance Director in Silicon Valley
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250