IMF Bentham Launches $500M Non-US Fund
The fund is the Australian litigation funder's second focused on disputes outside the U.S.
June 20, 2019 at 12:28 PM
3 minute read
Sydney-based litigation funder IMF Bentham Ltd. has launched a $500 million fund to underwrite disputes outside the United States.
The fund, called Fund 5, is IMF Bentham's second non-U.S. fund and is launching just two years after the litigation funder launched the first, which had an aggregate capital of about $115 million focused on investments in Australia, Asia, Canada and Europe. That fund was upsized in January to about $125 million.
DLA Piper and offshore firm Walkers advised IMF Bentham on the Fund 5 transaction.
IMF Bentham said it is increasing its fund capacity in direct response to increasing demand for dispute resolution finance around the world.
Fund 5 could double to $1 billion as investors have the option to roll into a successor fund on the same terms. IMF Bentham committed $100 million in cash to Fund 5, according to a regulatory filing with the Australian Securities Exchange, and the remaining funds were contributed by external investors, including funds managed by London-based Partners Capital Investment Group, Harvard University's endowment arm Harvard Management Co. Inc., Singapore-based Amitell Capital and Toronto-based Balmoral Wood.
Fund 5 will invest in disputes in Australia, Asia and Canada as well as Europe, the Middle East and Africa, across a broad range of dispute types, including insolvencies, group actions, international arbitration and commercial litigation. In February this year, Hong Kong began allowing third-party funding of international arbitration. Singapore started allowing it in March 2017.
With Fund 5, IMF Bentham has almost $1.4 billion in combined funds under management globally.
"IMF is experiencing strong market demand for funding across all jurisdictions," the litigation funder's Perth-based managing director and chief executive officer, Andrew Saker, said in a statement.
Since 2015, IMF Bentham recorded an 85% increase in the number of non-U.S. funding applications and a 149% increase in U.S. funding applications. The demand for dispute resolution finance is growing as a result of increased awareness, the increasing costs of arbitration, and litigation and regulatory changes allowing parties to seek dispute resolution finance, Saker explained.
"Demand is particularly strong in Asia and Canada, where dispute resolution finance is still relatively new but it is becoming a mainstream global financial product," he said.
In April, IMF Bentham partnered with Boies Schiller Flexner to provide up to $30 million in funding capital toward Vietnam-related cross-border disputes.
IMF Bentham has offices in Hong Kong and Singapore in Asia, as well as in Sydney, Perth, Brisbane, Melbourne and Adelaide in Australia.
|Related Stories:
Bentham, Boies Schiller Target Cross-Border Disputes in $30M Funding Deal
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllGibson Dunn Sued by Crypto Client After Lateral Hire Causes Conflict of Interest
Australian Corporations More Concerned About Class Actions Risk, HSF Report Finds
3 minute readSingapore Oil Tycoon Appeals 17.5 Year Prison Sentence In Fraudulent Trading Case
Charles Russell Speechlys Opens in Milan to Focus on Ultra-High Net Worth Clients
Trending Stories
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250