KPMG France Appoints Heavyweight Legal Adviser On Fidal Dispute
Both sides have appointed top-tier advisers to contest a dispute about the Big Four firm's hire of 144 lawyers.
June 21, 2019 at 04:27 AM
3 minute read
The French legal arm of KPMG has appointed top-tier external advisers on its dispute with local firm Fidal about a mass lawyer hire.
The Big Four accountancy firm has instructed highly rated local law firm Veil Jourde to help it defend action taken by Fidal in relation to KPMG's hire of 144 Fidal lawyers – including 26 partners – earlier this year, according to one person close to the process.
KPMG and Veil Jourde declined to comment.
On the other side, Fidal is being advised by Darrois Villey Maillot Brochier, a top-tier French firm that focuses on corporate transactions and dispute resolution.
The fact both are represented by well-regarded firms demonstrates the seriousness with which each side is taking the dispute, which initially erupted on the basis of Fidal's claim that KPMG breached a break-clause when the two firms ended their non-exclusive partnership, which began in 2011 and ended in July 2018.
During discussions prior to ending the partnership, Fidal said two reassurance clauses had been agreed by KPMG: one being the notice that the agreement was ending, and the other a non-poaching clause until 2020, which stated that KPMG could not hire lawyers from Fidal without Fidal's written consent.
However, there is disagreement about how those discussions concluded.
At the time of the hires, KPMG said in statement: "The constructive proposals, made to Fidal to ensure the future of their teams, dedicated to the KPMG network, were rejected by the representatives of Fidal. In this context, a number of professionals have decided to leave Fidal and have expressed their wish to join 'KPMG Avocats'."
This is denied by Fidal.
Fidal is asking for compensation for the damages suffered, which the firm said include a damaged image, loss of turnover, disrespect towards a contract and unfair competition, among others.
The dispute is still in the preliminary stages: Fidal is in the process of finalising all the proceedings against KPMG, having now carried out a damage assessment. A hearing date has not yet been confirmed.
Speaking in French, Fidal managing partner Yves de Sevin said: "[I still have] the same feeling: we respect KPMG's strategy but its form, which disrespects the agreements, is unacceptable and as such, we will defend the interests of the law firm with the greatest determination."
He added that the next step for the dispute is to hear KPMG's response to Fidal's legal action.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllAshurst Strengthens Tokyo Office With Partner Hire From Big Four Japanese Firm AMT
K&L Gates Duo Leaves to Reunite with Former Leader at Sreenivasan Chambers
Clifford Chance Among Advisers as Prince Harry Newspaper Hearing Begins
3 minute readTrending Stories
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250