The Firms With The Largest Pension Liabilities
One top firm has by far the largest defined benefit pension scheme liability and will pay in at least £18 million a year to plug the gap.
June 21, 2019 at 05:50 AM
2 minute read
Clifford Chance has the largest pension liability in the U.K. top 50 and is one of just nine other firms with such deficits, according to research by Legal Week and Smith & Williamson.
CC had a defined benefit pension scheme liability of £283 million by the end of the financial year 2017-18, a 17% improvement on the previous year when it had a liability of £341 million, according to information in its LLP accounts.
In its filings, the Magic Circle firm wrote that it was aiming to eliminate its deficit by May 2026. It added that actuaries had estimated that employer contributions set to be paid to the pension scheme by April 2019 were £18 million, after which contributions will increase year on year in line with retail price index inflation levels.
The statement continued: "Funding levels are monitored on an annual basis and the next triennial valuation is due to be completed as at 30 April 2019. The weighted average duration of the defined benefit obligation is around 26 years."
CC's liability dwarves those of the other nine firms in the top 50 with liabilities. Simmons & Simmons had the next largest liability with £19.6 million, an 18% improvement on 2016-17.
The other firms in the top 10 to have a liability at the end of financial year 2017-18 were Hogan Lovells International (£15.3 million), Norton Rose Fulbright (£8.4 million), Stephenson Harwood (£3 million), Trowers & Hamlins (£2.8 million), DAC Beachcroft (£2.2 million), Withers (£1.8 million), Blake Morgan (£1 million) and Clyde & Co (£900,000).
A spokesperson for DAC Beachcroft said in a statement that its liability arose from a defined benefit pension scheme operated by legacy firm Davies Arnold Cooper, which Beachcroft merged with in 2011, adding that the scheme is now in run-off.
The statement continued: "The firm has an approved plan in place to address the current deficit and will continue to meet the running costs of the scheme during the run-off period. The firm now operates a defined contribution pension scheme."
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllFCA Fines Metro Bank £16.7M Over ‘Financial Crime Failings’
Milbank Leads Bonus Race, Announces Year-End Pay News
K&L Gates Hires Energy Partner from Gibson Dunn in Singapore
Trending Stories
- 1Judicial Ethics Opinion 24-58
- 2Sweet James Clinches $17.4M Personal Injury Jury Verdict in California's Kings County
- 3In Lame-Duck Session, US Senate Confirms Illinois Federal Judge on Bipartisan Vote
- 4Gordon Rees Opens 80th Office, ‘Collaboration Hub’ in Palo Alto
- 5The White Stripes Drop Copyright Claim Against Trump Campaign
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250