Scott+Scott Expands in Amsterdam
The addition of the three attorneys—Damiën Berkhout, Stefan Tuinenga and Marianne Meijssen—will boost the firm's litigation and competition law practice.
June 26, 2019 at 02:04 PM
3 minute read
Less than one month after Scott+Scott officially launched an office in Amsterdam, the U.S.-based firm has recruited a partner and two senior lawyers for that office – its only one in continental Europe.
Damiën Berkhout has joined the firm as a partner from the Dutch law firm Buren, where he was also a partner. He previously worked for the Benelux law firm Stibbe in Amsterdam.
Stefan Tuinenga and Marianne Meijssen have also made the move. Tuinenga was previously head of the Fair Trade Authority of Curacao, and Meijssen joins from the Dutch independent law firm Maverick, which specialises in competition law. Like Berkhout, she previously worked at Stibbe.
All three attorneys have extensive experience in litigation and competition law. Berkhout is an expert in complex litigation and cartel damages claims. Tuinenga has longstanding experience in international antitrust litigation and collective actions. Meijssen specialises in competition litigation.
"It is exciting to join the first international firm devoted to claimant-side litigation in the Netherlands," Berkhout said.
Scott+Scott, which has offices in New York, Connecticut, California and London and focuses its practice solely on claimant litigation, advises multinational corporations and institutional investors on recovery programmes and opportunities. It also helps companies recoup money in complex cases involving competition law violations and other misconduct.
David Scott, the firm's managing partner, said expansion of the Amsterdam office was in response to client demand for competition expertise. Clients want a be able to choose whether they litigate in London or Amsterdam, he said. The firm's only other non-U.S. office is in London.
Scott said the firm chose to expand in Amsterdam because it is a sophisticated legal centre and is "very claimant-friendly".
Scott+Scott aims to use the Amsterdam office to secure relief for U.S.-based clients without having to engage separate local law firms. The office will also address client concerns about litigating claims in the U.K. post-Brexit, he said.
While Scott declined to discuss in detail further growth plans for the Amsterdam office, he said that "given early indications, the office is going to grow significantly".
Scott+Scott has represented a range of corporations in Europe, including Hermès, GrandVision and Vodafone, in lawsuits against Visa and Mastercard alleging that the fees they impose for accepting payment cards breach European competition law.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllNorton Rose Racial Discrimination Complaint Triggered South African IT Probe
4 minute readHogan Lovells Takes Partner Quartet, Hiring from Dechert, Ashurst in Singapore
Trending Stories
- 1Can The Threat of a Bar Complaint Be a Settlement Tool?
- 2Sentencing Commission Addresses Inconsistent Definitions of “Loss”
- 3What Are Forbidden Sexual Relations With Clients?
- 4AEDI Takeaways: Demystifying Hype, Changing Caselaw & Harvey’s CEO Talks State of Industry
- 5New England Law | Boston Announces New Dean
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250