Baker McKenzie Tops Asia-Pacific Law Firm Brand Ranking for Third Straight Year
The global firm has been named the top law firm brand in the region by the market research firm Acritas since 2017.
July 09, 2019 at 07:00 PM
3 minute read
For the third consecutive year, Baker McKenzie is the top law firm brand in the Asia-Pacific region, according to the 2019 Asia Pacific Law Firm Brand Index published by U.K.-based market research firm Acritas.
The global firm's brand has been ranked top in the region by Acritas since 2017.
"Awareness and favourability growth in China and Hong Kong have been crucial to gaining such a lead at the top of the table for the firm," the report says of the Baker McKenzie brand.
In May, Baker McKenzie's Chinese alliance firm FenXun Partners grew to more than 100 lawyers, including 20 partners, with the addition of an eight-lawyer finance team from Zhong Lun Law Firm. FenXun has tripled in size since 2015, when it formed the alliance with Baker McKenzie under a special programme in the Shanghai Free Trade Zone.
However, Baker McKenzie has been struggling in Myanmar, significantly reducing the size of its office in Yangon after a string of partner departures, including office head Jo Daniels.
The rest of the top six also remained unchanged from last year's ranking, with King & Wood Mallesons, Herbert Smith Freehills, Clifford Chance, Chinese firm JunHe and Korea's Kim & Chang at second to sixth places, respectively.
This year saw Ashurst and Zhong Lun both rise to seventh, tied with Japanese firm Mori Hamada & Matsumoto, which moved up from 10th last year. Ashurst, which ranked fifth in 2017, jumped up from 12th last year, thanks to strong growth in brand awareness in Hong Kong and consideration for top-level work in Australia, according to the report.
Meanwhile, Australia's MinterEllison fell from seventh to 10th, and Japan's Nishimura & Asahi, India's Shardul Amarchand Mangaldas & Co and DLA Piper all dropped out of the top 10 this year.
Acritas said the 2019 index was based on the responses of 489 Asia-Pacific-based senior in-house lawyers from organisations with more than $50 million in annual revenue. The research firm also asked an additional 413 senior in-house counsel from companies with $1 billion annual revenue or more, about their legal needs in seven Asian markets other than their base.
The research firm said all interview respondents were drawn from its own database of in-house counsel contacts and said the research was not influenced by law firms. Acritas counts Baker McKenzie, King & Wood Mallesons, Ashurst and Lex Mundi, an international referral network whose member firms include JunHe and Shardul Amarchand, as clients.
In-house lawyers were asked until the end of May about their awareness of and favourability toward law firms, their consideration of firms for top-level litigation and major mergers and acquisitions, and their use of firms for high-value work.
|Related Stories:
Baker McKenzie Is Top Asia-Pacific Law Firm Brand, Report Says
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllNew Frontiers: Gaillard Banifatemi Shelbaya Launches in Cairo and Abu Dhabi
4 minute readTravers Gives Holiday Bonus, Ropes & Gray Reduces Time Off Allowance
1 minute readJapan’s Mori Hamada Joins Funder LCM for $150M Credit Suisse Bonds Claim
Trending Stories
- 1Trump's SEC Overhaul: What It Means for Big Law Capital Markets, Crypto Work
- 2Armstrong Teasdale's London Creditors Face Big Losses
- 3Texas Court Invalidates SEC’s Dealer Rule, Siding with Crypto Advocates
- 4Quinn Emanuel Has Thrived in China. Will Trump Help Boost Its Fortunes?
- 5Manufacturer Must Provide Details Surrounding Expert’s Livestreamed Inspection, Fed Court Rules
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250