Ince's Singapore Departures Continue as Alliance Firm Director Returns to Local Firm
Former Incisive Law director Moses Lin rejoins Singaporean firm Shook Lin & Bok as a partner and maritime practice head.
July 12, 2019 at 12:18 PM
2 minute read
A director at Ince Gordon Dadds' formal law alliance in Singapore has left to rejoin a local firm – the latest in a string of senior departures in the city-state since Gordon Dadds' tumultuous takeover of Ince & Co at the end of last year.
Moses Lin joins Shook Lin & Bok as a partner, focusing on commercial litigation and arbitration in the maritime and commodities sectors. He will head the firm's maritime practice.
Lin leaves Incisive Law, Ince's formal law alliance partner firm since 2011, after almost three years with the firm. He joined as an associate director in 2016 after the departure of Incisive Law co-head Mohan Subbaraman, who left for Reed Smith alongside former Ince & Co Singapore managing partner Richard Lovell. Lin was promoted to director in 2017.
Previously, Lin was an associate at Hill Dickinson and Clyde & Co's Singapore joint law venture firm, Clasis. Earlier in his career, he also practised with U.K.-based insurance services firm Charles Taylor and was an associate at Shook Lin & Bok.
Lin is the latest senior lawyer to leave Incisive Law or Ince's Singapore office since late last year, right around the time when Ince & Co agreed to a merger with Gordon Dadds. Since then, Ince's Singapore office lost its managing partner John Simpson, finance head Martin Brown and global terminals and maritime infrastructure practice head Ton van den Bosch, as well as Incisive Law director Felicia Tan. Simpson and Brown both jumped to Stephenson Harwood, van den Bosch joined Addleshaw Goddard and Tan left for local firm TSMP Law Corp.
Lin's departure leaves Incisive Law with just two directors: joint managing directors Bill Ricquier and Edgar Chin. Ince currently has four partners in Singapore: office head and ship finance specialist Devandran Karunakaran, maritime lawyer Harry Hirst and disputes lawyers Maureen Poh and Nicholas Lum.
|Related Stories:
Ince Loses Singapore Managing Partner, Finance Head as Gordon Dadds Agrees to Merge
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllNew Frontiers: Gaillard Banifatemi Shelbaya Launches in Cairo and Abu Dhabi
4 minute readTravers Gives Holiday Bonus, Ropes & Gray Reduces Time Off Allowance
1 minute readJapan’s Mori Hamada Joins Funder LCM for $150M Credit Suisse Bonds Claim
Trending Stories
- 1Gibson Dunn Sued By Crypto Client After Lateral Hire Causes Conflict of Interest
- 2Trump's Solicitor General Expected to 'Flip' Prelogar's Positions at Supreme Court
- 3Pharmacy Lawyers See Promise in NY Regulator's Curbs on PBM Industry
- 4Outgoing USPTO Director Kathi Vidal: ‘We All Want the Country to Be in a Better Place’
- 5Supreme Court Will Review Constitutionality Of FCC's Universal Service Fund
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250