Magic Circle and US Firms Team Up On Thomas Cook Rescue Deal
The travel giant has struggled in a market that has become dominated by online agents.
July 15, 2019 at 04:00 AM
2 minute read
Slaughter and May, Latham & Watkins, Milbank and Clifford Chance are advising on a £750 million deal to keep Thomas Cook afloat, following a major dip in profits at the travel giant.
The company has had a difficult time competing with the major online travel agents, and announced by way of a statement that it was in advanced talks with its largest shareholder, Fosun Tourism Group, as well as the company's core lending banks, on a proposed recapitalisation of the group.
Both Slaughters and Latham are acting for Thomas Cook.
Advising the company's board, Slaughters' team is led by restructuring partner Ian Johnson, financing partner Ed Fife and corporate partner Richard Smith.
Meanwhile, Latham is advising the company and its in-house team with corporate partners Nick Cline and Richard Butterwick, restructuring partner John Houghton, banking partner Ross Pooley, and capital markets partner James Inness leading the team.
Under the current proposal, Fosun will inject £750 million of new money into the company in a bid to keep it trading into the winter period.
Clifford Chance is advising Fosun on the deal, with corporate partner Tim Lewis and banking and finance partner David Towers leading.
Fosun Tourism is a branch of Chinese investment giant Fosun International, and it currently owns an 18% stake in Thomas Cook. If the deal closes successfully, Fosun would acquire a majority stake in the company.
Milbank is advising the bookrunners on the deal, with a team led by financial restructuring partners Yushan Ng, Jacqueline Ingram and Peter Newman.
Last month, CC and Slaughters advised on the £6 billion acquisition of Merlin Entertainment by its shareholders.
Slaughters also represented Legal & General in its multibillion-pound partnership with Oxford University to develop new homes for university staff and students.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllLawyers Among Those Convicted as Hong Kong High Court Sentences 45 Activists to Prison
South Africa Regulator’s Staffing Problems Leave High-Stakes M&A Deals in Limbo
4 minute readGerman Court Finds Facebook Must Pay Users for Data Breach, But Less Than Expected
Singapore Tycoon Loses Suit Against HSBC, Sentenced To Prison On Forgery Charges
Trending Stories
- 1'We’re Here to Empower People to Make Good Decisions': Why Compliance Chiefs Must Learn to Think Like a Businessperson
- 2People in the News—Nov. 19, 2024—Pond Lehocky, Duane Morris
- 3Court System's Franklin H. Williams Judicial Commission Presents Annual Diversity Awards
- 4Commentary: James Madison, Meet Matt Gaetz
- 5The Narcissist’s Dilemma: Balancing Power and Inadequacy in Family Law
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250