SRA Alerted as Cubism Collapse Investigation Uncovers Client Money Shortfall
The shortfall is connected to a major KFC franchisee, according to people close to the matter.
August 07, 2019 at 10:34 AM
2 minute read
The Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA) has been notified of a significant shortfall in client account money that contributed to the collapse of 'New Law' firm Cubism, which closed its doors in July.
As part of its investigation into the collapse, the firm's administrators Quantuma are now liaising with the SRA following the discovery of an unexplained client account shortfall which, according to three people close to the matter, hovers around the £250,000 mark. Two people said the shortfall was a factor leading to the firm's collapse.
The client in question was a major U.K. franchisee of fast-food chain KFC, according to three people with detailed knowledge of the situation, which turned to Cubism following last year's widely-publicised chicken supply shortage.
Administrator Andrew Hosking of Quantuma told Legal Week: "Cubism Law was clearly suffering significant financial pressures prior to entering insolvency. During the period prior to the insolvency, a full reconciliation of all client accounts was performed, which is quite the normal check procedure necessary before advising a regulator."
Hosking continued: "During that period of reconciliation, it was discovered that there was indeed a client account shortfall on one particular matter. This was promptly notified to the regulator [SRA] and the directors of [Cubism], who made good this discrepancy from their own personal funds.
"Accordingly, all client interests had been protected prior to the firm's demise. The shortfall and the reasons for the shortfall are currently subject to our investigation and we are liaising closely with the regulator on this matter."
Cubism – which operates on a New Law model, whereby lawyers work as self-employed consultants – last month fell into administration, with fee-earners dispersing across London to rival firms Keystone Law and Gunnercooke, among several others.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllHSF Hires Trio for Luxembourg Launch, Builds Private Capital Practice
LexisNexis Responds to Canadian Professor’s Criticism of Lexis+ AI
CMS Targets Mauritian Investment Market with Local Boutique Partnership
3 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Cars Reach Record Fuel Economy but Largely Fail to Meet Biden's EPA Standard, Agency Says
- 2How Cybercriminals Exploit Law Firms’ Holiday Vulnerabilities
- 3DOJ Asks 5th Circuit to Publish Opinion Upholding Gun Ban for Felon
- 4GEO Group Sued Over 2 Wrongful Deaths
- 5Revenue Up at Homegrown Texas Firms Through Q3, Though Demand Slipped Slightly
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250