Creditors Set to Lose Millions on Ince & Co Administration
An administrator's report has revealed a slew of creditors, including legacy Ince & Co partners who are claiming more than £15m.
August 14, 2019 at 10:37 AM
3 minute read
The creditors of now-insolvent Ince & Co are facing a multimillion-pound shortfall in what is owed to them, the administrators' progress report has revealed.
Ince & Co was acquired by listed firm Gordon Dadds – now known as Ince Gordon Dadds LLP – as part of a pre-pack administration sale on December 31, 2018. The progress report, made public today (August 18) by administrators Quantuma via Companies House, reveals the assets, creditors, debtors and costs associated with the process.
The report shows that legacy Ince & Co's former members have made 29 claims totalling £15.8 million in relation to capital and current account balances. In addition, the firm's former France branch – which did not participate in the prepack sale – has claimed just shy of £5 million. The firm's other main creditors, both secured and unsecured, include trade creditors, banks, insurers and landlords among others.
Unsecured creditors of the main entity subject to the administration – Ince & Co London, now known as Blue Co London LLP – have just shy of £4 million available to them in the way of realised assets, the report shows. This means they will likely suffer an estimated deficiency of more than £2.7 million, the statement shows.
Meanwhile, the creditors of Blue International Services are likely to face a more than £8 million hit, should the administration progress as forecast. After expenses – such as fees connected to administrators, legal advisers, banks and contractors – £351,713 in assets were realised in the administration of the legacy firm's services branch.
As things stand, once secured and preferential creditors are paid, the London LLP's unsecured creditors will receive less than 60% of what is owed to them, while those of the international services sub-company will receive just 4%.
The shortfall owes primarily to liabilities connected to bank loans and facilities that Ince & Co took out. This is composed almost entirely of debts owed to key creditor RBS, which has made a £6.3 million claim against both the London LLP and the services branch. The estimated outcome statement indicates that these liabilities either have been or are expected to be paid.
The administration document also shows that Ince Gordon Dadds paid a nominal £1 as consideration for the assignment of legacy Ince & Co's six leases at Aldgate Tower. So far, the landlord has been paid £558,481 out of assets realised.
Meanwhile, the administrators have settled legal fees of £153,000 – owed principally to Pinsent Masons, which was brought in around the same time administrators were appointed. However, £31,000 of this remains outstanding. Separately, Pinsents partner Samantha Palmer, who is overseeing much of the administration process as solicitor manager, is owed more than £173,000, of which £97,000 has now been paid.
The joint administrators at Quantuma, Andrew Hosking and Sean Bucknall, are meanwhile expecting to receive about £700,000 for their services.
City firm Macfarlanes too has made an as yet unapproved claim of £59,000 in the way of pre-administration costs.
Ince's international LLP combined with Ince Gordon Dadds in April this year following a protracted process, while a dispute over client data between Ince Gordon Dadds and the now-independent France branch rumbles on.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All‘Are You Not Profiting From Postmasters’ Misery?’—Politicians Grill HSF, Dentons on Post Office Conduct
'Not a Good Look'—FCA Fines Barclays £40M But Accused of Incompetence
Gibson Dunn Sued by Crypto Client After Lateral Hire Causes Conflict of Interest
Australian Corporations More Concerned About Class Actions Risk, HSF Report Finds
3 minute readTrending Stories
- 1DOJ Asks 5th Circuit to Publish Opinion Upholding Gun Ban for Felon
- 2GEO Group Sued Over 2 Wrongful Deaths
- 3Revenue Up at Homegrown Texas Firms Through Q3, Though Demand Slipped Slightly
- 4Warner Bros. Accused of Misleading Investors on NBA Talks
- 5FTC Settles With Security Firm Over AI Claims Under Agency's Compliance Program
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250