Stress and Depression Rife as Almost One in Two Lawyers Experience Work-Related Mental Illness
The surprisingly high numbers come as three quarters say they feel under pressure to work extended hours, Legal Week's inaugural job satisfaction survey reveals.
September 10, 2019 at 05:36 AM
7 minute read
Nearly half of the U.K.'s top lawyers have experienced mental health-related illnesses such as depression and stress due to their work, Legal Week's job satisfaction survey has found.
Forty-four percent said they had suffered such illness, with more than half of female respondents saying they had, the survey of 248 commercial lawyers found. Levels of illness were also more common among lawyers under the age of 30 and those working in large firms with more than 1,000 lawyers.
"Being a lawyer is the most stressful yet boring job in the world," said one female lawyer at a large international firm. "I'd never recommend it to anyone. Ever."
The findings come as four in 10 lawyers said they work more than 50 hours every week, and 37% admitted to having worked at least one all-nighter in the past year.
Among men, nearly half (47%) claimed to work more than 50 hours, with one in seven saying they exceed the 60-hour mark. For women, more than a third (34%) admitted working more than 50 hours and 9% said they breached the 60-hour mark.
Even among parents, 42% said they work more than 50 hours a week.
"It feels like success at work directly leads to a worsening home life and work/life balance"
Multiple submissions for the survey referenced the detrimental impact of a "long hours culture", the fixation with billable hours and the pressure that came from managing client expectations.
One male lawyer in his 30s at a midsized firm commented: "The better you perform the more in demand you are from clients and internally. This means more hours.
"It feels like success at work directly leads to a worsening home life and work/life balance. The worst lawyers in our firm have the best lifestyle."
Billable hour under fire
When asked what one thing they would change about the profession, the most common theme by far from respondents related to work-life balance issues.
There were calls for "more humane timelines and hours", "realistic deadlines" and "acceptance of fixed work hours", as many claimed the billable hour model actively encouraged inefficiency.
One salaried partner at a large London-based law firm stated that the focus on billable hours "severely adversely affects mental health and makes it very hard for lawyers to switch off and enjoy down time".
In total, 74% of the respondents from across the industry said they feel under pressure to work beyond their contracted hours in order to justify their position, with nearly a third claiming that they actively dislike their job.
Lawyers working in-house however appeared to be generally more positive about their jobs, with 35% of them feeling very positive about their role compared to 20% at law firms.
"We are at the complete mercy of clients, to the detriment of our own health and wellness"
One lawyer at a small London-based firm likened their working environment to that of a factory.
"You are required to get the work in and out and quickly as possible and on time," they said. "This is no matter how much work you have – no consideration is given for the amount of work you have and urgency. Everything must be responded to within 48 hours."
On the subject of client expectations, one solicitor said: "We are at the complete mercy of clients, to the detriment of our own health and wellness."
Younger lawyers felt particularly affected – 79% of under-30s felt pressured to work overtime and half said they've suffered illnesses because of this work.
This work and stress seems to have filtered through into their perception of law. Under-30s were the most disillusioned about their work, with just 42% saying they liked their job, compared with 61% of over-40s.
According to one male trainee, his U.S.-based firm has "no respect for holiday, no respect for not being on emails whilst away, no perks [and] no days in lieu".
"There is a culture of bullying, discrimination and total lack of respect for its employees. Partner profits are the top priority for this firm"
One lawyer at one of the U.K.'s top firms described the firm's culture as "toxic and hypocritical", adding it was: "Always banging on about diversity, mental health support and whatever policy makes the firm look 'good' to the outside world. In fact, there is a culture of bullying, discrimination and total lack of respect for its employees. Partner profits are the top priority for this firm."
Industry approach 'not really working'
Another lawyer, who is in their 30s at a large law firm, demanded that there "must be a better focus on recognising and decreasing anxiety and depression".
Adding: "As part of that, there needs to be more flexible working arrangements with reduced hours and flexi-contracts, and hence increasing the number of women – and more 'well-balanced' men, rather than sociopaths and workaholics – in more senior roles."
"I do wonder what the attraction will be to young people coming into the profession going forward"
According to some respondents, the impact of the hours and stress could ultimately put younger generations off the industry. As one older solicitor concluded: "I have had a good career in the law, but year on year it gets more pressurised.
"I do wonder what the attraction will be to young people coming into the profession going forward."
"If we remain in a chronically stressful situation for extended periods, we will all feel the effects and the distress"
Jonathan Moult, a former banking partner at Simmons & Simmons turned psychologist at Moult Coppin, commented that the fallout from a long-hours, high-stress environment are unsurprising: "We're human beings, if we remain in a chronically stressful situation for extended periods, we will all feel the effects and the distress and possibly we'll act out to compensate; it may well taint our experience of work and life.
"The problem is not being realistic about how hard people work and its impact over time, if left unattended."
Moult, who runs a private psychology and psychotherapy practice aimed at City workers, with colleague Jonathan Coppin, argues that firms' response to stress and depression is currently too reactive, waiting for employees themselves to identify a "problem" and seek help.
"That's the medical model – waiting for a person to put their hand up – that there's something wrong that needs fixing," Moult said.
"It's suggesting: 'You're not coping, something's gone wrong and now we've got to treat it.' That approach is not really working at the moment."
Moult suggests that instead of reacting to problems as they arise, firms may need to think about taking a more proactive approach by organising sessions with a psychologist for lawyers at certain points in their careers, on an opt-out rather than opt-in basis. The aim, he says, is to "help destigmatise any notions that you only get to talk to a someone when you're not coping".
If you wish to share your own experiences of mental health problems in the workplace, you can reach out in confidence to Legal Week editor-in-chief Paul Hodkinson at [email protected] or news editor Rose Walker at [email protected].
If you have been affected by any of this reporting, or wish to find out more information and advice on the topics covered, third-party resources can be found at the following links: https://www.nhs.uk, https://www.mentalhealth.org.uk and mind.org.uk
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllSingapore Litigators Shift Competitive Landscape as Another Senior Duo Sets Up Own Shop
Squire Patton Boggs Hires 7-Lawyer Team to Beef Up ESG Practice in Brussels
2 minute readSkadden, White & Case Guide Citigroup Demerger in Mexico
Trending Stories
- 1No Two Wildfires Alike: Lawyers Take Different Legal Strategies in California
- 2Poop-Themed Dog Toy OK as Parody, but Still Tarnished Jack Daniel’s Brand, Court Says
- 3Meet the New President of NY's Association of Trial Court Jurists
- 4Lawyers' Phones Are Ringing: What Should Employers Do If ICE Raids Their Business?
- 5Freshfields Hires Ex-SEC Corporate Finance Director in Silicon Valley
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250