The EU's Antitrust Czar Just Got More Powerful
Margrethe Vestager was nominated for a second five-year term and given an expanded role overseeing EU digital policy. That may not be good news for Big Tech.
September 12, 2019 at 03:43 PM
3 minute read
U.S. tech giants such as Apple, Google and Facebook will remain under close scrutiny from the EU's antitrust czar during her second term, according to a senior Brussels lawyer.
Andreas von Bonin, a partner with Freshfields Bruckhaus Deringer in Brussels and head of the firm's Brussels antitrust, competition and trade practice, said Margrethe Vestager, the EU's head of antitrust who was nominated for a second five-year term this week, would likely keep U.S. tech companies "under very close scrutiny".
During the last five years, Vestager, as the EU's main antitrust enforcer, took on most of the biggest U.S. tech companies in a number of cases. She hit Apple with a €14 billion (about $15.5 billion) bill for unpaid taxes, fined Google €1.49 billion ($1.7 billion) for abuse in the online advertising market, and charged Facebook €110 million ($122 million) for misleading competition authorities over the acquisition of messaging service WhatsApp.
Vestager's dogged pursuit of multinationals over tax issues caught the attention of President Donald Trump. In 2018, he said in reference to Vestager: "Your tax lady, she really hates the U.S."
But Vestager rejects accusations that she is singling out U.S. companies, pointing out that she has pursued Italian carmaker Fiat and other European companies for avoiding taxes.
In addition to nominating Vestager for a second term as competition commissioner, incoming EU President Ursula von der Leyen expanded her role to include oversight of digital issues. Her official title is executive vice-president for making Europe "fit for a digital age".
Von Bonin said von der Leyen's decision to keep Vestager as antitrust chief was a "resounding endorsement by European leaders of the way she has led competition enforcement over the last five years".
Vestager is also valued for her communication skills, von Bonin said, adding: "She was perceived as someone able to explain the benefits of competition enforcement for Europe and present it as a means of getting a 'fair deal' for citizens and consumers."
It is unclear how Vestager will combine her roles as antitrust enforcer and digital policy czar responsible for encouraging the EU's development in the digital field. "[This] is a new combination, von Bonin said. "We will need to see how this works in the coming years."
|Related Stories:
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All'Almost Impossible'?: Squire Challenge to Sanctions Spotlights Difficulty of Getting Off Administration's List
4 minute read'Never Been More Dynamic': US Law Firm Leaders Reflect on 2024 and Expectations Next Year
7 minute readTrending Stories
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250