Cleary Gottlieb Counsels Brazil's Petrobras on $20 Billion Offerings
Simultaneously, the firm advised on $10 billion in liability management transactions for state oil firm Mexico's Petróleos Mexicanos (Pemex).
September 18, 2019 at 01:05 PM
3 minute read
Cleary Gottlieb Steen & Hamilton is leading Brazilian state oil company Petróleo Brasileiro S.A. (Petrobras) through a $20 billion abbreviated five-day debt exchange and related tender – the New York-based law firm's second gargantuan deal this month in Latin America.
The Petrobras offerings, which close and settle on Wednesday, come on the heels of $10 billion in liability management transactions that Cleary advised on last week for another big state oil firm, Mexico's Petróleos Mexicanos (Pemex).
Shearman & Sterling advised the underwriters on both the Petrobras and the Pemex deals.
Cleary partner Jorge Juantorena, who worked the Pemex deal, said the simultaneous transactions called for some serious hustle within the firm.
"To execute both these transactions in the same week required us to mobilise expertise in multiple areas – liability management, oil and gas, debt capital markets, disclosure – at scale and in three languages," he said.
The Petrobras exchange and tender offers launched simultaneously on September 9, just two days before the Mexican government announced a cash injection and debt tender for Pemex. The transactions used similar techniques: a combination of five-day, fixed-spread cash tender offers in coordination with exchange offers for new, longer-dated securities.
"The liability management business is becoming increasingly sophisticated, with tailored transaction designs that allow fast transactions and efficient pricing," said Cleary partner David Lopez, who worked both the Petrobras and Pemex deals.
Both oil firms have leaned heavily on debt to finance operations. Petrobras, though, has fared better in the eyes of the ratings agencies. Fitch raised the Brazilian company's standalone credit profile by two notches in March, noting "robust cash generation" and significant debt reduction. The ratings agency also applauded Petrobras for reporting capital structure improvement during the past few years.
Pemex, meanwhile, has been under threat of credit downgrades. Since the oil firm is a quasi-sovereign, its debt carries an implicit guarantee from the Mexican government. Cleary partner Nicolas Grabar advises the Mexican Finance Ministry on Pemex matters.
The Petrobras offer targeted seven series of outstanding notes. Cleary also advised Petrobras in a concurrent new money offering of one series of U.S.-dollar denominated global notes issued in the exchange offer. The exchange and related tender targeted $20 billion of notes.
Petrobras is one of the world's largest integrated oil and gas companies, engaged in a broad range of activities. Cleary has represented Petrobras for many years in significant regulatory reporting, corporate governance, financing and litigation matters.
"We have been working with Petrobras for nearly two decades, and the management of the debt profile is constantly more sophisticated and more nimble," said Cleary partner Francesca Odell, who advised on the Petrobras transaction.
Abbreviated offerings are key to this nimbleness. Traditional exchange offers must be open for 20 business days, whereas abbreviated exchange offers are only required to be open for five business days.
This shorter deal window minimises an issuer's exposure to market volatility.
The U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) first sanctioned abbreviated exchange offers in 2015, at the behest of law firms.
Cleary joined a group of law firms that requested a no-action letter several years ago from the SEC to clarify the conditions in which abbreviated exchange offers – like the ones deployed for Pemex and Petrobras – are permitted.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllLinklaters Sees Latest Partner Exit as UK Leveraged Finance Partner Walks To Simpson Thacher
2 minute readEx-Dewey & LeBoeuf Banking Lawyer on Trial in Germany’s Cum-Ex Tax Scandal
DLA Piper & Hogan Lovells Expand German Construction and Property Practices
2 minute readWhite & Case, Cleary Among Firms Gearing Up for Biggest London IPO Since 2022
3 minute readTrending Stories
- 1First California Zantac Jury Ends in Mistrial
- 2Democrats Give Up Circuit Court Picks for Trial Judges in Reported Deal with GOP
- 3Trump Taps Former Fla. Attorney General for AG
- 4Newsom Names Two Judges to Appellate Courts in San Francisco, Orange County
- 5Biden Has Few Ways to Protect His Environmental Legacy, Say Lawyers, Advocates
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250