Another Record Year for Class Actions in Australia
In about three-quarters of the new actions, a litigation funder was involved.
September 20, 2019 at 01:37 PM
3 minute read
A total of 54 class actions commenced in Australia in the most recent fiscal year, equalling last year's record and prompting judges to take a more active role in case management, according to a report by King & Wood Mallesons.
The rise has prompted King & Wood to ask in its report The Review – Class Actions in Australia 2018/2019, whether the high level of class action activity is "the new normal".
The firm counted at least 54 new class actions filed in the year to June 30, with nearly half of them relating to securities or financial products and investment claims. About three quarters of the new actions involved a litigation funder.
There were also 16 consumer claims, including products liability claims in relation to the Essure contraceptive device, Hardi spray units, faulty airbags and aluminium composite, and an action by the taxi industry seeking compensation from Uber.
There were also claims against the state and employment claims.
King & Wood says Australian courts have become more active in monitoring and managing the conduct and progress of class action cases – from the commencement of a matter right through to its finalisation.
"The increase in the number of class actions being commenced has led to the courts' readiness to adopt a broad range of case management options in order to ensure the quick, inexpensive and efficient administration of justice," the report states.
Courts are placing a stronger onus on parties to resolve issues outside of court, so they can make sure the courts will not be overburdened and to ensure there are fewer issues in contest. They are also appointing case management judges to quickly and efficiently manage the proceedings as well as to hear any interlocutory disputes.
The report notes there is increased judicial scrutiny into the proportionality of litigation funding charges and legal costs to ensure that the "legitimate use of the court's processes are not undermined by proceedings that disproportionally benefit the funder and solicitor rather than the litigants".
Examples include conducting tender processes in competing class actions that require cost budgets to be provided, and auditing cost experts' reports.
The King & Wood report provides a snapshot of the state of class actions in Australia.
Among plaintiff firms, the "usual protagonists" dominated, with Maurice Blackburn commencing 10 actions, Slater and Gordon seven, and Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan, Shine Lawyers and William Roberts Lawyers four each.
About three quarters of new actions had a funder involved. Top among them were IMF Bentham with eight, Harbour Litigation Funding with seven, and Augusta Ventures with five.
Twenty-two class action settlements were approved by the courts in 2018-19 and, while the full value of all settlements is not known, King & Wood said publicly available information indicates at least A$500 million (US$340 million) in settlement funds was approved.
The most significant settlements were the A$215 million (US$146 million) settlement of various actions against Standard & Poor's/McGraw-Hill companies in relation to the rating of structured debt products and synthetic CDOs; and the A$132.5 million (US$90 million) settlement of the QBE securities class action, where shareholders alleged the insurance company engaged in false and misleading conduct and breached its continuous disclosure obligations ahead of a profit downgrade, which caused the share price to plunge.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllMilbank, Wachtell, Ropes and Pittsburgh Duo Aim to Save Nippon Steel's US Steel Merger
Bird & Bird Steers Katjes in Bittersweet Dispute with Lindt & Nestlé Over Vegan Chocolate Patent
Baker McKenzie, Norton Rose & Other Top Litigators Foresee Rise in AI, Data & ESG Disputes
Trending Stories
- 1'It's Not Going to Be Pretty': PayPal, Capital One Face Novel Class Actions Over 'Poaching' Commissions Owed Influencers
- 211th Circuit Rejects Trump's Emergency Request as DOJ Prepares to Release Special Counsel's Final Report
- 3Supreme Court Takes Up Challenge to ACA Task Force
- 4'Tragedy of Unspeakable Proportions:' Could Edison, DWP, Face Lawsuits Over LA Wildfires?
- 5Meta Pulls Plug on DEI Programs
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250