DLA Piper Partner Accused of Sexual Assault Pushed Out
"The firm has concluded for various reasons that it is in the best interest of the firm that we part ways with Louis Lehot," leadership said in a firmwide email Friday.
October 11, 2019 at 05:51 PM
3 minute read
Louis Lehot, the San Francisco-based DLA Piper partner who was accused of sexual assault by a fellow partner last week, has been let go by the firm, sources confirmed last week (11 October).
In an email to DLA Piper lawyers and staff Friday afternoon, the text of which was obtained by The American Lawyer, firm leadership acknowledged Lehot's departure.
"We are saddened that this type of allegation has arisen at our firm," the email said, regarding partner Vanina Guerrero's allegation that Lehot sexually assaulted her multiple times after recruiting her to join the firm.
"Despite the fact that the allegations have not been substantiated by the investigation to date, the firm has concluded for various reasons that it is in the best interest of the firm that we part ways with Louis Lehot," the email said. "We understand and share the deep concern about this matter, and would like to be in a position to share more detailed information. This is an ongoing legal matter, however, and therefore we cannot share further details."
The firm also noted in its email that "we remain steadfastly committed to our zero-tolerance policy for harassment in the workplace."
Lehot's biography was no longer on DLA Piper's website as of Friday afternoon, though it had appeared there earlier in the day. Lehot did not immediately respond to a request for comment.
A spokesman for DLA Piper did not respond to requests for comment Friday afternoon.
Stacy Paz, now listed as the sole managing partner of the firm's Palo Alto, California, office said, "I'm sorry, I can't speak right now," when reached by phone Friday afternoon.
Guerrero lodged sexual assault accusations against Lehot and called out the firm's mandatory arbitration policy in an open letter and Equal Employment Opportunity Commission filing last week.
Reached for comment Friday, Guerrero's lawyer, Jeanne M. Christensen of Wigdor LLP, said letting Lehot go is a "first step."
"But DLA Piper has said nothing about releasing Ms. Guerrero from forced arbitration," Christensen said. "This continued silence means DLA Piper intends to enforce the provision. It needs to explain why."
Also Friday, a lawyer who formerly worked in DLA Piper's office of general counsel published a response to Guerrero's letter on the website Medium, in which she offered support to Guerrero and criticized DLA Piper's mandatory arbitration policy. She said the firm has a "culture of intimidation and oppression."
Ross Todd and Dan Packel contributed to this report.
|Read More
DLA Piper Partner Accused of Sexual Assault in EEOC Claim, Open Letter
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllApple Subsidiaries in Belgium and France Sued by DRC Over Conflict Minerals
2 minute readDLA Piper, Heuking & Other Key Moves as German Legal Market Reshuffles Ahead of 2025
2 minute readTrending Stories
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250