Ex-DLA Piper Partner Blasts Assault Claims As Second Woman Comes Forward
Louis Lehot has blasted his initial accuser for "exploiting" #MeToo. A second complainant has since come forward.
October 22, 2019 at 04:25 AM
3 minute read
Louis Lehot, the former DLA Piper partner who was dismissed from the firm earlier this month after being accused of sexual assault by partner Vanina Guerrero, has accused Guerrero of "exploiting the #MeToo movement to cover up her own issues".
Yesterday (October 21), Lehot made his first public statement since the accusations against him surfaced. He denied Guerrero's claims and provided more than 40 pages of purported emails between the two lawyers showing friendly exchanges during the period of time in which Guerrero has alleged she was assaulted repeatedly.
Later in the day it emerged that a second woman, a former human resources employee at DLA Piper, has also lodged a complaint against Lehot.
She claims that she was fired early this year after complaining that she was "physically afraid" to be near Lehot.
Lawyers at Wigdor LLP, the same firm that represented DLA Piper partner Vanina Guerrero in raising allegations about Lehot, yesterday lodged a complaint with the U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) on her behalf.
According to a letter attached to the former employee's EEOC charge, she claims that Lehot threatened her after she refused to fire an administrative assistant he wanted terminated. The former HR employee further claims that she was fired after she complained to firm management that she feared being near Lehot or left alone with him.
In an open letter published earlier this month, Guerrero accused Lehot of sexually assaulting her multiple times in the months after he recruited her to join the firm. She also called on DLA Piper to release her from her mandatory arbitration agreement with the firm.
Lehot was fired from the firm several days later.
But less than a week after Lehot was pushed out, DLA Piper announced that it had placed Guerrero on administrative leave. The firm said that while investigating her claims against Lehot, it had found that another person had accused Guerrero of inappropriate behaviour.
"It's good to see the truth is beginning to come out. I did not assault or harass Vanina Guerrero and she knows it," Lehot said in his statement.
"I acknowledge poor judgement in developing an emotional relationship with Vanina Guerrero. I deeply regret the pain this has caused my family, colleagues, clients and friends," Lehot continued. "This isn't victim-blaming or victim-shaming. She's not a victim here."
According to Lehot, he agreed to leave the firm earlier this month because he acknowledged that he should not have developed an emotional relationship with the junior partner. He said he fully cooperated with DLA Piper's investigation, and alleged that Guerrero refused to cooperate.
Lehot made reference to numerous emails between himself and Guerrero, around the times of the alleged assaults, in which they coordinated travel arrangements and Guerrero requested a seat next to him on flights. The emails also showed discussion of personal matters, like an exchange of advice on which bedsheets Lehot should buy.
Reached for comment yesterday, Wigdor LLP partner Jeanne Christensen, who represents Guerrero, said, "By this, Louis Lehot is saying he's OK with litigating in open court and no secret arbitration."
Spokespeople for DLA Piper, reached on Monday, referred to the firm's previous statements on the matter.
Dan Packel contributed to this report.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllApple Subsidiaries in Belgium and France Sued by DRC Over Conflict Minerals
2 minute readDLA Piper, Heuking & Other Key Moves as German Legal Market Reshuffles Ahead of 2025
2 minute readTrending Stories
- 1The Key Moves in the Reshuffling German Legal Market as 2025 Dawns
- 2Social Media Celebrities Clash in $100M Lawsuit
- 3Federal Judge Sets 2026 Admiralty Bench Trial in Baltimore Bridge Collapse Litigation
- 4Trump Media Accuses Purchaser Rep of Extortion, Harassment After Merger
- 5Judge Slashes $2M in Punitive Damages in Sober-Living Harassment Case
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250