£4M Recovered, £3M to Go In Ince & Co Wind-Up
Former partners are among those in line to lose around £9 million as many claims look set to remain unpaid.
November 27, 2019 at 08:57 AM
4 minute read
The wind-up of the now-insolvent Ince & Co has recovered about £4.5 million, with between £2 million and £3 million more expected to come in, according to a person with knowledge of the situation.
The recovered money will be distributed among creditors and will cover the costs of the administration, in a process is that expected to "go on for some time", the person added.
Ince & Co was wound up as part of a pre-packaged administration takeover by listed firm Gordon Dadds at the turn of the New Year. It resulted in the AIM-listed firm acquiring much of Ince & Co's assets, comprised primarily of the firm's partner base and intellectual property, leaving Ince & Co a shell that was placed into administration and later renamed 'Blue Co London'.
Earlier this year, Legal Week, the U.K. arm of Law.com, reported that the creditors – which include landlords Brookfield and lender RBS – were set to lose millions on the administration. A progress report showed that Ince & Co's former members had made 29 claims totalling £15.8 million, largely linked to capital and current account balances.
According to current figures, this could leave creditors about £8 million to £9 million out of pocket. Among those losing out are likely to include former partners, who claim they are owed millions by the firm.
In January, a group of former Ince & Co partners turned to Eversheds Sutherland to front them in a dispute about money they claim they are owed. The terms of the pre-pack administration meant ex-partners faced losses of as much as £500,000, including six-figure personal loans paid into the firm plus a potential tax bill.
The progress report showed that a large amount of the defunct firm's liabilities are tied to bank loans and facilities that Ince & Co took out. This is composed almost entirely of debts owed to key creditor RBS, which made a £6.3 million claim.
Among the key matters being dealt with now, according to the person, is so-called loss relief, which relates to reducing the firm's corporation tax burden, and maximising returns to creditors.
Soon after the shortfall was reported, restructuring and insolvency partner at Freshfields Bruckhaus Deringer Richard Tett commented: "Recovering value from an insolvent law firm is notoriously difficult and, by definition, the unsecured creditors are highly likely to lose a lot of money.
"Much of the value in a professional services firm is in the work in progress. However, as client service on current transactions is often disrupted by the insolvency, that value can be greatly reduced. Also, if there is secured debt as there is here, that takes first slice of any value. In fact, a 60% recovery for unsecured debt is not too bad compared to many insolvencies."
Gordon Dadds' takeover of Ince & Co was seen across the industry as a move to annex the 100-year-old shipping firm's name, goodwill and international reach in a bid to bolster the Gordon Dadds' listed share price and brand recognition.
Gordon Dadds now trades on the AIM market as The Ince Group, which was as of midday today (November 27) trading at 119p per share.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllSingapore Litigators Shift Competitive Landscape as Another Senior Duo Sets Up Own Shop
Squire Patton Boggs Hires 7-Lawyer Team to Beef Up ESG Practice in Brussels
2 minute readSkadden, White & Case Guide Citigroup Demerger in Mexico
Law Firms Mentioned
Trending Stories
- 1No Two Wildfires Alike: Lawyers Take Different Legal Strategies in California
- 2Poop-Themed Dog Toy OK as Parody, but Still Tarnished Jack Daniel’s Brand, Court Says
- 3Meet the New President of NY's Association of Trial Court Jurists
- 4Lawyers' Phones Are Ringing: What Should Employers Do If ICE Raids Their Business?
- 5Freshfields Hires Ex-SEC Corporate Finance Director in Silicon Valley
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250