£4M Recovered, £3M to Go In Ince & Co Wind-Up
Former partners are among those in line to lose around £9 million as many claims look set to remain unpaid.
November 27, 2019 at 08:57 AM
4 minute read
The wind-up of the now-insolvent Ince & Co has recovered about £4.5 million, with between £2 million and £3 million more expected to come in, according to a person with knowledge of the situation.
The recovered money will be distributed among creditors and will cover the costs of the administration, in a process is that expected to "go on for some time", the person added.
Ince & Co was wound up as part of a pre-packaged administration takeover by listed firm Gordon Dadds at the turn of the New Year. It resulted in the AIM-listed firm acquiring much of Ince & Co's assets, comprised primarily of the firm's partner base and intellectual property, leaving Ince & Co a shell that was placed into administration and later renamed 'Blue Co London'.
Earlier this year, Legal Week, the U.K. arm of Law.com, reported that the creditors – which include landlords Brookfield and lender RBS – were set to lose millions on the administration. A progress report showed that Ince & Co's former members had made 29 claims totalling £15.8 million, largely linked to capital and current account balances.
According to current figures, this could leave creditors about £8 million to £9 million out of pocket. Among those losing out are likely to include former partners, who claim they are owed millions by the firm.
In January, a group of former Ince & Co partners turned to Eversheds Sutherland to front them in a dispute about money they claim they are owed. The terms of the pre-pack administration meant ex-partners faced losses of as much as £500,000, including six-figure personal loans paid into the firm plus a potential tax bill.
The progress report showed that a large amount of the defunct firm's liabilities are tied to bank loans and facilities that Ince & Co took out. This is composed almost entirely of debts owed to key creditor RBS, which made a £6.3 million claim.
Among the key matters being dealt with now, according to the person, is so-called loss relief, which relates to reducing the firm's corporation tax burden, and maximising returns to creditors.
Soon after the shortfall was reported, restructuring and insolvency partner at Freshfields Bruckhaus Deringer Richard Tett commented: "Recovering value from an insolvent law firm is notoriously difficult and, by definition, the unsecured creditors are highly likely to lose a lot of money.
"Much of the value in a professional services firm is in the work in progress. However, as client service on current transactions is often disrupted by the insolvency, that value can be greatly reduced. Also, if there is secured debt as there is here, that takes first slice of any value. In fact, a 60% recovery for unsecured debt is not too bad compared to many insolvencies."
Gordon Dadds' takeover of Ince & Co was seen across the industry as a move to annex the 100-year-old shipping firm's name, goodwill and international reach in a bid to bolster the Gordon Dadds' listed share price and brand recognition.
Gordon Dadds now trades on the AIM market as The Ince Group, which was as of midday today (November 27) trading at 119p per share.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All‘Are You Not Profiting From Postmasters’ Misery?’—Politicians Grill HSF, Dentons on Post Office Conduct
'Not a Good Look'—FCA Fines Barclays £40M But Accused of Incompetence
Gibson Dunn Sued by Crypto Client After Lateral Hire Causes Conflict of Interest
Australian Corporations More Concerned About Class Actions Risk, HSF Report Finds
3 minute readLaw Firms Mentioned
Trending Stories
- 1Weil Advances 18 to Partner, Largest Class Since 2021
- 2People and Purpose: AbbVie's GC on Leading With Impact and Inspiring Change
- 3Beef Between Two South Florida Law Firms Deepens With Suit Over Defamation
- 4Judge Skips Over Sanctions in Talc Bankruptcy: 'That’s A No'
- 5Hit by Mail Truck: Man Agrees to $1.85M Settlement for Spinal Injuries
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250