Gary Senior Hearing Opens With Allegations of Attempting to Kiss Junior Associate
The incident involving the former Baker McKenzie London head allegedly occurred in a hotel room after a late-night drinking session.
December 02, 2019 at 09:22 AM
4 minute read
The Solicitors Disciplinary Tribunal (SDT) hearing into the conduct of Baker McKenzie's former London managing partner Gary Senior opened this morning (December 2) to a packed courtroom, which heard allegations that he had drunkenly attempted to kiss a junior associate.
Senior stands accused of "seeking to initiate intimate activity" with a person at his former firm, known only as Person A, whom he had "authority and responsibility over".
On the first day of the 15-day hearing, the counsel for the SRA Andrew Tabachnik QC elaborated on the allegations made against Senior in a witness statement by Person A – a junior associate of six-months' post-qualification experience.
According to the statement, on February 23, 2012, Senior, Person A and about 100 other members of staff attended a recruitment dinner. Later on, a smaller group went out to a bar and then onto a nightclub before going back to Senior's hotel room at about 2am, where they ordered more alcohol.
Before 3am, the party broke up and only Senior and Person A were left in the room after he invited her to stay, according to Person A.
Senior proceeded to tell Person A she was attractive and attempted to kiss her on the neck, which her barrister argued was "unwelcome" and "unwanted".
Shortly after Person A left the room, allegedly at just past 3am, she received an email from Senior stating: "I'm sorry."
Throughout the weekend, Person A emailed herself details of the events of that Friday night and decided to call in sick on Monday, as she "could not face coming into work".
In an email to Witness B referring to the alleged incident, she stated: "I feel very uncomfortable about it and I am going to call in sick tomorrow as I don't want to be in the office."
As a result, on the Monday following the incident, Person A was not in the office when Senior is alleged to have visited her office, apparently to apologise.
During that week, the incident was reported to former Baker McKenzie head of human resources Martin Blackburn, who then met with Person A in a coffee shop to discuss the issue.
During that meeting, he allegedly read out a statement from Senior stating he was "deeply sorry" for his behaviour and was "terribly embarrassed". The statement further added: "I was drunk, it was a moment of madness. One of the reasons why I am a popular managing partner is because I enjoy drinking with others."
He then acknowledged that what had happened in the hotel room was "clearly not right" and that when he gets drunk, "he gets tactile and affectionate, but he doesn't get unpleasant".
Blackburn and Senior allegedly spoke about the situation the following day, with the latter stating in an email to Senior he was "confident we will get through it".
On February 29, Blackburn decided to take legal advice from an external source on the matter – James Davies at Lewis Silkin – and told Senior about his intention to do that.
A Baker McKenzie spokesperson said in a statement: "We have been cooperating fully with the SRA since the beginning of this process last year. In September 2018, we shared with the SRA the findings of the report we commissioned into the 2012 incident, which was carried out in conjunction with the law firm Simmons & Simmons. We've learned much from this episode, recognised what went wrong and have well-established and effective policies and programmes in place across the firm."
The hearing continues.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllAs Uncertainty Continues Over PGA Merger, LIV Golf Hires Entertainment Industry Veteran as Legal Chief
Ted Olson, Legal 'Titan' and Former US Solicitor General Who Argued Bush v. Gore, Dies
Law Firms Mentioned
Trending Stories
- 1Court Rules Mere Conduit Defense Not Suitable for a Motion to Dismiss
- 2Ironclad Officially Launches New Gen AI Assistant Jurist
- 3After Litigation with Ex-COO, Proskauer Fills Role
- 4Federal Judge Sends Novel Damages Question in Employment Dispute to State Court
- 5Trade Secret Litigation: How Will AI Innovations Likely Be Litigated?
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250