Gary Senior Hearing Opens With Allegations of Attempting to Kiss Junior Associate
The incident involving the former Baker McKenzie London head allegedly occurred in a hotel room after a late-night drinking session.
December 02, 2019 at 09:22 AM
4 minute read
The Solicitors Disciplinary Tribunal (SDT) hearing into the conduct of Baker McKenzie's former London managing partner Gary Senior opened this morning (December 2) to a packed courtroom, which heard allegations that he had drunkenly attempted to kiss a junior associate.
Senior stands accused of "seeking to initiate intimate activity" with a person at his former firm, known only as Person A, whom he had "authority and responsibility over".
On the first day of the 15-day hearing, the counsel for the SRA Andrew Tabachnik QC elaborated on the allegations made against Senior in a witness statement by Person A – a junior associate of six-months' post-qualification experience.
According to the statement, on February 23, 2012, Senior, Person A and about 100 other members of staff attended a recruitment dinner. Later on, a smaller group went out to a bar and then onto a nightclub before going back to Senior's hotel room at about 2am, where they ordered more alcohol.
Before 3am, the party broke up and only Senior and Person A were left in the room after he invited her to stay, according to Person A.
Senior proceeded to tell Person A she was attractive and attempted to kiss her on the neck, which her barrister argued was "unwelcome" and "unwanted".
Shortly after Person A left the room, allegedly at just past 3am, she received an email from Senior stating: "I'm sorry."
Throughout the weekend, Person A emailed herself details of the events of that Friday night and decided to call in sick on Monday, as she "could not face coming into work".
In an email to Witness B referring to the alleged incident, she stated: "I feel very uncomfortable about it and I am going to call in sick tomorrow as I don't want to be in the office."
As a result, on the Monday following the incident, Person A was not in the office when Senior is alleged to have visited her office, apparently to apologise.
During that week, the incident was reported to former Baker McKenzie head of human resources Martin Blackburn, who then met with Person A in a coffee shop to discuss the issue.
During that meeting, he allegedly read out a statement from Senior stating he was "deeply sorry" for his behaviour and was "terribly embarrassed". The statement further added: "I was drunk, it was a moment of madness. One of the reasons why I am a popular managing partner is because I enjoy drinking with others."
He then acknowledged that what had happened in the hotel room was "clearly not right" and that when he gets drunk, "he gets tactile and affectionate, but he doesn't get unpleasant".
Blackburn and Senior allegedly spoke about the situation the following day, with the latter stating in an email to Senior he was "confident we will get through it".
On February 29, Blackburn decided to take legal advice from an external source on the matter – James Davies at Lewis Silkin – and told Senior about his intention to do that.
A Baker McKenzie spokesperson said in a statement: "We have been cooperating fully with the SRA since the beginning of this process last year. In September 2018, we shared with the SRA the findings of the report we commissioned into the 2012 incident, which was carried out in conjunction with the law firm Simmons & Simmons. We've learned much from this episode, recognised what went wrong and have well-established and effective policies and programmes in place across the firm."
The hearing continues.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All![X Ordered to Release Data by German Court Amid Election Interference Concerns X Ordered to Release Data by German Court Amid Election Interference Concerns](https://images.law.com/cdn-cgi/image/format=auto,fit=contain/https://images.law.com/international-edition/contrib/content/uploads/sites/392/2023/10/AdobeStock_627004176_Editorial_Use_Only-767x633.jpg)
X Ordered to Release Data by German Court Amid Election Interference Concerns
![Quinn Emanuel's Hamburg Managing Partner and Four-Lawyer Team Jump to Willkie Farr Quinn Emanuel's Hamburg Managing Partner and Four-Lawyer Team Jump to Willkie Farr](https://images.law.com/cdn-cgi/image/format=auto,fit=contain/https://k2-prod-alm.s3.us-east-1.amazonaws.com/brightspot/fa/c2/5b8749a84b7eb919caed3ca3d306/quinn-emanuel-urquhart-sullivan-office-sign-washington-13-767x633.jpg)
Quinn Emanuel's Hamburg Managing Partner and Four-Lawyer Team Jump to Willkie Farr
![Trump ICC Sanctions Condemned as ‘Brazen Attack’ on International Law Trump ICC Sanctions Condemned as ‘Brazen Attack’ on International Law](https://images.law.com/cdn-cgi/image/format=auto,fit=contain/https://images.law.com/international-edition/contrib/content/uploads/sites/392/2023/11/Trump-Donald-White-House-2019-029-767x633-1.jpg)
Trump ICC Sanctions Condemned as ‘Brazen Attack’ on International Law
![U.S.- China Trade War: Lawyers Label WTO Dispute Pointless, Clients Have Their Hands Tied U.S.- China Trade War: Lawyers Label WTO Dispute Pointless, Clients Have Their Hands Tied](https://images.law.com/cdn-cgi/image/format=auto,fit=contain/https://k2-prod-alm.s3.us-east-1.amazonaws.com/brightspot/ea/56/920bdb1d42d59b3af46660326473/us-china-flags-767x633.jpg)
U.S.- China Trade War: Lawyers Label WTO Dispute Pointless, Clients Have Their Hands Tied
Law Firms Mentioned
Trending Stories
- 1States Accuse Trump of Thwarting Court's Funding Restoration Order
- 2Microsoft Becomes Latest Tech Company to Face Claims of Stealing Marketing Commissions From Influencers
- 3Coral Gables Attorney Busted for Stalking Lawyer
- 4Trump's DOJ Delays Releasing Jan. 6 FBI Agents List Under Consent Order
- 5Securities Report Says That 2024 Settlements Passed a Total of $5.2B
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250