Ericsson's Simpson Thacher Team Resolves FCPA Claims for $1B
"Ericsson's corrupt conduct involved high-level executives and spanned 17 years and at least five countries, all in a misguided effort to increase profits," Brian Benczkowski, head of DOJ's criminal division, said in a statement.
December 06, 2019 at 05:36 PM
5 minute read
The original version of this story was published on National Law Journal
|
Ericsson AB on Friday agreed to pay more than $1 billion to resolve claims that the Swedish telecommunications company paid bribes between 2000 and 2017 to build business in Asia, Africa and the Middle East, capping a long-running investigation with one of the largest penalties ever assessed in the U.S. government's enforcement of anti-corruption law.
The settlement came three months after the Stockholm-based Ericsson, represented by Simpson Thacher & Bartlett partner Cheryl Scarboro, said it had set aside $1.2 billion to cover anticipated U.S. penalties. Under the terms of the settlement, Ericsson agreed to pay a $520 million criminal penalty to the Justice Department and give up about $540 million in alleged ill-gotten gains to the Securities and Exchange Commission.
Ericsson is also required to retain an independent compliance monitor for three years.
Brian Benczkowski, the head of the Justice Department's criminal division, had hinted earlier this week that the settlement was imminent. Without naming Ericsson, Benczkowski said at a conference in the Washington area that an upcoming corporate settlement would vault the Justice Department into a record year for recovering money under the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act, a federal law prohibiting overseas bribery.
In a prepared statement, Benczkowski credited the Internal Revenue Service, the SEC and federal prosecutors in Manhattan with their assistance in the investigation.
"Ericsson's corrupt conduct involved high-level executives and spanned 17 years and at least five countries, all in a misguided effort to increase profits," Benczkowski said Friday. "Such wrongdoing called for a strong response from law enforcement, and through a tenacious effort with our partners in the Southern District of New York, the SEC, and the IRS, today's action not only holds Ericsson accountable for these schemes, but should deter other companies from engaging in similar criminal conduct.
The Justice Department and SEC alleged that Ericsson used intermediaries to bribe officials in six countries, including Saudi Arabia and China, winning business valued at about $427 million as it scored lucrative contracts with state-owned telecommunications firms. Ericsson was also accused of having intermediaries pay for entertainment and lavish travel for government officials and their families.
Scarboro, a Washington-based Simpson Thacher partner and formerly the first chief of the SEC's FCPA unit, did not immediately comment.
Ericsson's CEO and president Börje Ekholm said in a statement: "I am upset by these past failings. Reaching a resolution with the US authorities allows us to close this legacy chapter. We can now move forward and build a stronger company."
The company pointed to number of steps taken to improve the ethics and compliance program. Those steps include refreshing compliance training; "introducing more sophisticated analytic tools to better identify and prevent high-risk transactions and engagements"; and enhanced ethics and compliance vetting for senior leaders.
The settlement marked the seventh criminal resolution the Justice Department reached with a corporation this year. It came on the heels of a shipbuilding subsidiary of the South Korea-based Samsung Group agreeing to pay $75 million to resolve corruption allegations stemming from a scheme to pay millions of dollars in bribes to Brazilian government officials. In another noteworthy settlement, Walmart Inc. paid $137 million to resolve an investigation into alleged bribery of government officials in Mexico, India, Brazil and China.
The Justice Department this year also issued declination letters to two companies under its policy for crediting companies that voluntarily disclose misconduct and cooperate with the government. In both cases, the Justice Department highlighted the companies' prompt reporting of misconduct and efforts to improve their compliance programs.
The Justice Department said Ericsson did not disclose the misconduct, which involved high-level executives. Ericsson was, however, credited for launching an internal probe, turning over extensive records and making regular presentations to the Justice Department, among other steps to cooperate with the government's investigation.
The more than $520 million criminal penalty reflected a 15% reduction from the bottom of the fine range set by federal sentencing guidelines, in what the Justice Department said was a nod to Ericsson's efforts to improve its compliance program.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All‘Are You Not Profiting From Postmasters’ Misery?’—Politicians Grill HSF, Dentons on Post Office Conduct
'Not a Good Look'—FCA Fines Barclays £40M But Accused of Incompetence
Gibson Dunn Sued by Crypto Client After Lateral Hire Causes Conflict of Interest
Australian Corporations More Concerned About Class Actions Risk, HSF Report Finds
3 minute readLaw Firms Mentioned
Trending Stories
- 1Cars Reach Record Fuel Economy but Largely Fail to Meet Biden's EPA Standard, Agency Says
- 2How Cybercriminals Exploit Law Firms’ Holiday Vulnerabilities
- 3DOJ Asks 5th Circuit to Publish Opinion Upholding Gun Ban for Felon
- 4GEO Group Sued Over 2 Wrongful Deaths
- 5Revenue Up at Homegrown Texas Firms Through Q3, Though Demand Slipped Slightly
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250