Sullivan & Cromwell, Latham & Watkins on $4B Korea Ecommerce Deal
German online delivery company Delivery Hero S.E. is buying South Korean rival Woowa Brothers Corp.
December 23, 2019 at 05:12 AM
2 minute read
Sullivan & Cromwell and Latham & Watkins have the lead roles on a $4 billion deal that will see German online delivery company Delivery Hero S.E. acquire South Korean rival Woowa Brothers Corp.
As part of the deal, Berlin-based Delivery Hero will pay $1.88 billion (€1.7 billion) in cash and $2.1 billion (€1.9 billion) in shares for a 88% stake in Seoul-based Woowa, which operates popular delivery app Baedal Minjok; the German company will acquire the remaining 12% stake over the next four years, according to a statement. Delivery Hero will also launch a Singapore-based subsidiary responsible for running the company's Asia operations; Woowa founder and chief executive Bongjin Kim will lead the venture.
The deal, expected to close in the second half of 2020, is subject to regulatory approvals including clearance from the Korea Fair Trade Commission, the country's antitrust watchdog. If goes through, the deal will give Delivery Hero control of Korea's top three online delivery services. The company already operates two of Baedal Minjok's competitors YoGiYo and Baedaltong.
Sullivan & Cromwell Frankfurt partners Konstantin Technau and Carsten Berrar are leading a team representing Delivery Hero. Brussels partner Michael Rosenthal is advising on antitrust matters and Frankfurt partner Max Birke advises on financing.
Bae, Kim & Lee partner Mok-Hong Kim advises the buyer on Korean law while WongPartnership partner Teo Hsiao-Huey advises on Singaporean law.
Latham & Watkins Frankfurt partner Leif Schrader and Seoul partner Steve Kang are leading a team advising Woowa. Kim & Chang partner Sung Uk Park advises the seller on Korean law including antitrust matters.
A separate team at Sullivan & Cromwell, led by Hong Kong partner Garth Bray, is representing a group of Woowa shareholders. The team also includes York Schnorbus in Frankfurt Juan Rodriguez in London.
|This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllBird & Bird Steers Katjes in Bittersweet Dispute with Lindt & Nestlé Over Vegan Chocolate Patent
Hong Kong Bourse Seeks Feedback on IPO Price Discovery, Takes Steps to Boost Capital Markets Activity
Big Four Japanese Firm Mori Hamada Launches Foreign Joint Law Enterprise, Joins Rebrand Drive
US Wins Trade Dispute with Mexico Over Genetically Modified Corn
Law Firms Mentioned
Trending Stories
- 1Appellate Division Greenlights State Bar's Leadership Diversity Initiatives
- 2SEC’s Latest Enforcement Actions Fuel Demand for Big Law
- 3Sterlington Brings On Former Office Leader From Ashurst
- 4DOJ Takes on Largest NFT Scheme That Points to Larger Trend
- 5Arnold & Porter Matches Market Year-End Bonus, Requires Billable Threshold for Special Bonuses
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250