Dealmaker: Tony Keal
A former Allen & Overy veteran and one of the founding fathers of Europe's leverage finance market, Tony Keal joined Simpson Thacher last year
September 13, 2006 at 08:03 PM
4 minute read
A former Allen & Overy veteran and one of the founding fathers of Europe's leverage finance market, Tony Keal joined Simpson Thacher last year
Why did you become a lawyer?
I did law at Oxford (at the time, I couldn't think of any other subject to read). Then it seemed daft not to at least qualify. My seat in articles with Bill Tudor John introduced me to banking, and the rest is history, some of which is still in the making.
Who has been the biggest influence on your career?
Different people during different phases; Bill initially. Graham Hutton of Morgan Grenfell as well, when we started doing leveraged buy-outs together in and around 1990. Over the past four years, Johannes Huth at Kohlberg Kravis Roberts & Co.
What is your proudest professional moment?
The same moment, repeated frequently over a lengthy period – seeing my assistants make partner: Stephen Gillespie, Euan Gorrie, Jacqui Evans, David Lines, Cathy Bell-Walker, Ian Borman, Davide Mencacci, Vikki Greatorex and others.
…and worst day on the job?
Signing day of the first Swedish Match buy-out in 1989-90. After three days without much sleep, I embarked around 10pm the night before signing on cloning the mezz from the senior doc agreed that night. I fell asleep at my desk, woke up around 8am with a not-even-half-finished mezz doc and a closing starting in two hours. Ultimate horror.
Aside from your own firm, which lawyer do you most admire and why?
There are so many, but it would be invidious to single out individuals from those I meet regularly. Of those not now practising, Jonathan Horsfall Turner and Peter Totty.
What is your strongest characteristic… and worst trait?
Strongest characteristic, saying what I mean and meaning what I say… worst trait – probably the same. Likewise, having a passion for the deals and for my clients' interests.
What will be the most significant market trend in terms of your practice area over the next 12 months?
The continuation of exceptionally high levels of activity by private equity houses in relation to jumbo deals, involving ever larger and more complex targets and increasingly complex financing structures. The increasing use of PIK instruments.
How do you think your assistants view you?
Depends on the circumstances. At 3am in the morning, seeking to staff a new deal, rather differently than in the pub on a Friday evening. I would hope, however, that most of those who have worked with me have gained something from the experience which has enhanced their career.
What's the best part of your job?
Dealing with exceptionally bright principals, especially in the private equity houses, on some of the world's biggest and most complex financings, and being made to feel like one of their team rather than a bought commodity.
What most annoys you about the legal profession?
Particularly in some UK firms, too many people in management roles, many with an exaggerated sense of the value of their own limited contribution. Also, the hours.
There weren't many leveraged finance specialists in the City early in your career – what drew you to the area?
Partly circumstantial, i.e. place, time, friendship with others involved (Richard Halcrow, Graham Hutton, Peter Combe, Andrew McCullagh, Charlie Green, to name just a few). Also, leveraged finance is as close to M&A 'deal-doing' as you get without too much involvement with black-letter law.
Do you ever regret sending that e-mail?
The e-mail itself, no. The operator error in the addressing, certainly; but then again, perhaps I would not otherwise have moved on to better things (e.g. Simpson Thacher)! It is pleasing to see that much of the thrust of that e-mail has since at least started to be addressed.
What would you do if you were not a lawyer?
Were I at the outset of my career, with the knowledge I have now, private equity – if I could have mastered the sophisticated modelling involved.
Where do you see yourself in 10 years' time?
Spending a lot of time sailing, skiing and at home.
What is your favourite lawyer joke?
What can a goose do, a duck can't, and a lawyer should? [your readers to complete]
What is your favourite cheese?
Can I have more than one? Beaufort, Epoisse and Roquefort.
Dealmaker returns in two weeks.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllQuartet Of Firms Engaged As Adani Exits $2B Joint Venture With Singapore’s Wilmar
Baker McKenzie, Gibson Dunn Advise on $5 Billion KKR-Gulf Data Hub Deal
3 minute readHengeler, Noerr, Freshfields Steer Multi-Million Euro Deals for XXXLutz, Huf Group & More
3 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Courts Demonstrate Growing Willingness to Sanction Courtroom Misuse of AI
- 2The New Rules of AI: Part 1—Managing Risk
- 3Change Is Coming to the EEOC—But Not Overnight
- 4Med Mal Defense Win Stands as State Appeals Court Rejects Arguments Over Blocked Cross-Examination
- 5Rejecting 'Blind Adherence to Outdated Precedent,’ US Judge Goes His Own Way on Attorney Fees
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250