A&O to receive £2.5m public funding for Belfast support centre launch
Allen & Overy (A&O) is to launch an operational support and legal services centre in Belfast that is expected to grow to 300 members of staff by 2014. The initiative, which was announced to staff internally today (2 Ferbuary), will see the creation of a new support services centre delivering some core internal business support processes, as well as a legal services centre delivering some routine or less complex elements of legal work. The City giant expects to have as many as 300 staff based in Belfast by 2014 and is to begin consulting on proposals to transfer 180 roles from London in the autumn.
February 04, 2011 at 08:03 AM
4 minute read
Allen & Overy (A&O) is set to receive £2.5m of public funding in return for creating 300 new jobs in Belfast.
The magic circle firm will receive the funds from Invest Northern Ireland (NI) after applying to the body ahead of this week's announcement that it is to launch a business and legal support centre in Belfast later this year.
The £2.5m sum is based on the number of job opportunities created in the local market, with news of the funding coming as it emerged that Invest NI has offered Herbert Smith £208,000 of support towards its Belfast operation, which will create 26 jobs and generate total annual salaries of £650,000.
A&O announced earlier this week (2 February) that is opening an operational support and legal services centre in Belfast that is expected to grow to 300 members of staff by 2014.
The initiative announced to staff internally that day, will see the creation of a new Support Services Centre delivering some core internal business support processes, as well as a Legal Services Centre (LSC) delivering some routine elements of legal work.
The City giant expects to have as many as 300 staff based in Belfast by 2014 and is to begin consulting on proposals to transfer 180 roles from London by the autumn.
The total of 180 roles translates to 18% of A&O's total support function in London.
The 90-day consultation process will commence with London support staff shortly to determine which roles will transfer to Belfast, but the firm said there would be no lawyer redundancies as a result of the announcement. Any fee-earning roles at the new office will be newly-created.
Some support service processes such as elements of IT, HR, finance, business services and library will be delivered from the new office.
The majority of staff in Belfast are expected to join in phases over the first 15 months as core support processes transfer from London. Relocation packages will be offered to all with the intention of minimising job losses. No staff will be required to leave or relocate before the office is operational in the autumn.
The firm is also in the process of selecting an internal candidate to head up the office.
A&O managing partner Wim Dejonghe (pictured) commented: "This announcement follows a review of our support services in London. These proposals are about reshaping the firm for the future and asking ourselves: 'Are we operating in the most efficient and cost effective way possible?'
"Unfortunately this involves taking some tough decisions and looking at both what our competitors are doing and what our clients expect us to do. That's why it is not a decision we've taken lightly and we understand that our proposals will come as a surprise and be upsetting for those staff whose roles are potentially affected. We will do everything we can to support those staff and are committed to treating them professionally and sensitively.
"The reality is that the way global legal services are being delivered is changing. We have to meet that challenge and proactively offer increased efficiencies and alternative resourcing to our clients, but with the reassurance and quality they expect from A&O."
The move comes after Herbert Smith last year announced an initiative to set up a support centre in Belfast to handle support work in litigation. The office is to launch in April.
A&O said that Northern Ireland was particularly attractive due to its strong education system and quality of investment incentives.
For more analysis, see Editors blog: A&O's hard facts of life, and Heal thyself – law firms will remake themselves for the age.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllMilbank, Wachtell, Ropes and Pittsburgh Duo Aim to Save Nippon Steel's US Steel Merger
Kirkland, Macfarlanes Act as Evelyn Partners Offloads £700M Professional Services Arm
2 minute readTrending Stories
- 1The Appropriate Exemption in Students for Fair Admissions v. President & Fellows of Harvard College
- 2DOJ, 10 State AGs File Amended Antitrust Complaint Against RealPage and Big Landlords
- 3New Partners at Cummings & Lockwood, Carmody Torrance Sandak & Hennessey
- 4'Extra Government'?: NY Top Court Eyes Ethics Commission's Constitutionality
- 5South Texas College of Law Houston Selects New Dean
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250