Ringing the changes - Vodafone GC Rosemary Martin on career support for women in law
"Women tend to work collaboratively and innovatively, and should be part of the solution as law firms look at how their model needs to change" - Vodafone GC Rosemary Martin is calling on panel firms to provide better career support for women...
November 30, 2011 at 07:03 PM
4 minute read
Vodafone GC Rosemary Martin is calling on her panel firms to provide better career support for women, writes Caroline Hill
Vodafone's general counsel Rosemary Martin (pictured) has long been in the vanguard of the in-house movement to slash private practice rates, but in a high-level meeting planned for the New Year, she will call for much more extensive and deep-rooted change to the culture of City law firms.
In a meeting provisionally arranged for 25 January 2012, Martin has asked for attendance from a male equity partner from each of Vodafone's 14 panel firms to debate what measures need to be taken to offer women a much more viable long-term career solution. The discussion, which a number of general counsel and other interested parties will attend, will centre on how City firms as a whole must embrace change, innovation and creativity.
City firms' seeming reluctance to make the wholesale changes needed to support women is regarded by Martin as an integral part of the service problem. She is challenging the existing, typically male, power bases in City law firms, to create an environment in which women can thrive and to increase the percentage of women in the senior management team.
"[Firms are] driven by profits and by male characteristics – they are just not balanced enough," she says. "Women tend to work collaboratively and innovatively, and should be part of the solution as law firms look at how their model needs to change in light of not only client pressure but the brave new world looming under the now fully enacted provisions of the Legal Services Act."
The debate does not purely centre on women in law. Martin points out that while law firms are very good at generating profit, they are less good at thinking about how they deliver client service. "Delighting clients is not a big tick, partly because they are rigid and unchanging," Martin observes.
There are a number of reasons why the timing of this latest initiative is right, and why it is likely to resonate with City firms. The very real prospect of competition from a growing breed of non-conventional, flexible and highly cost-effective service providers such as Axiom (which Martin notably appointed to Vodafone's panel earlier this year), together with more standard outsourcing outfits such as CPA Global and Integreon, is already seeing City firms undertaking strategic naval gazing.
Top 50 law firms are increasingly embracing outsourcing deals while firms including Berwin Leighton Paisner and Eversheds are offering clients once-inconceivable annual fixed-priced deals and managed legal services. Outside of costs and perhaps touching on culture, firms are increasingly exploring new ways to share their know-how and open up their systems to enable clients to directly access their precedents.
The timing is also right to take a fresh look at women in law. Law firms are – or should be, Martin says – cognisant that they are facing a demographic time bomb, in which the post-baby boom years will suffer a significant drop in young workforce numbers. Consequently, she argues, there will be more pressure on firms to better retain both sexes to keep up in the war for talent.
"Firms need some attrition and women leaving to have children can be a convenience while the numbers are on your side, but in future the numbers may no longer work in firms' favour – you may find that they are leaving when you don't want them to," Martin warns.
A growing band of female general counsel and senior in-house lawyers are also adding to the pressure on panel law firms to show they have adequate flexible working policies, although Martin adds: "I am trying to get beyond the practicalities of maternity leave and flexible working and address the culture itself."
For the time being Martin can exert pressure on her own panel – which includes Linklaters, Slaughter and May, Herbert Smith, Hogan Lovells and Norton Rose – and she is keen to stress that she is delighted with the efforts they are making. "I have really enjoyed talking to the lawyers in the law firms about innovating, what we could do and how we could use the technology available."
While Martin admits that so far there has been little concrete innovation within the panel (the final line-up was only confirmed in September this year), there are signs that progress will be made. "There are a lot of things we are looking at and haven't done yet," Martin says. It remains to be seen whether, come January, progress will be expedited.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllTrump Win Ignites Global Legal Market: Lawyers Prepare for High Demand & Uncertainty
Cracking Canada: How International Law Firms Penetrate the Country's Legal Market
6 minute readHong Kong IPO Market Shows Signs of Slow but Steady Recovery
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250