Bird & Bird enters Korea via partnership with local firm
Bird & Bird has become the latest international law firm to enter Korea after signing a cooperation agreement with Seoul-based outfit Hwang Mok Park (HMP). The non-exclusive partnership will allow the two firms to participate in joint marketing and collaboration of client services, with a view to a more formal merger in the next two to three years.
February 24, 2014 at 07:03 PM
4 minute read
Bird & Bird has become the latest international law firm to enter Korea after signing a cooperation agreement with Seoul-based outfit Hwang Mok Park (HMP).
The non-exclusive partnership will allow the two firms to participate in joint marketing and collaboration of client services, with a view to a more formal merger in the next two to three years.
Kun-Su Mok, managing partner of HMP, will lead on the ground in Korea, while joint activity on the Bird & Bird side will be overseen by China chairman Justin Walkey alongside its head of the communications, media and technology (CMT) group in Hong Kong and China, Marcus Vass.
Bird & Bird currently has between 75 and 100 Korean clients but with no one partner in charge of the practice.
David Kerr, CEO of the firm, said the aim of the cooperation was to tap the Korean market for more corporate, dispute resolution and IP work, on both the inbound and outbound side as the economy continues to grow.
"We think Korea is one of the most important economies in Asia," he added. "We've seen a lot of growth.
"We are interested in increasing the amount of inbound work into Korea but also the amount of outbound work for a bigger range of clients coming out."
The UK-headquartered firm first revealed its plans to venture into Seoul in an interview with Legal Week in April last year, having identified particularly lucrative opportunities in areas such as intellectual property and technology, where the firm specialises.
The launch fits in with its wider plan to grow its Asia practice to account for 20% of firmwide revenues and lawyer headcount over the next three to five years, up from 15% presently.
In March it signed a similar cooperation agreement with Sydney law firm Truman Hoyle, which it also hopes to extend to a full merger in due course.
In Malaysia it has a tie up with Tay & Partners and in China with Lawjay Partners.
It also has offices in Hong Kong, Shanghai and Beijing, while it has a further base in Singapore through its global association with ATMD Bird & Bird.
Asked why the firm had chosen the cooperation model for Korea, Kerr said it would allow partners to get a better understanding of client requirements.
"Having analysed the Korean market we came to the conclusion that the best for us was to enter into a cooperation. We preferred that to the foreign legal consultant route that other firms have gone down.
"We feel very strongly that we need help to understand the psychology and culture of clients, so this is a great advantage for us.
"For now there will be no profit sharing – just trying to coordinate client services. But yes we would like the relationship to develop and get closer as regulation and time permits."
South Korea, Asia's fourth largest economy, has attracted a significant amount of interest from international law firms in the last two years following the liberalisation of its legal market.
Currently there are 18 foreign outfits with offices in Seoul, including Linklaters, Clifford Chance, Cleary Gottlieb Steen & Hamilton and Simpson Thacher & Bartlett.
For UK firms there have been some barriers to entry due to rules which require the chief representative of the Korean office to have qualified in the firm's home jurisdiction and practised there for at least three years.
However, a number of British outfits, including Ashurst and Stephenson Harwood, continue to show interest in the market.
Related: Stephenson Harwood hires DLA's Seoul chief for Korean opening
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllSingapore Litigators Shift Competitive Landscape as Another Senior Duo Sets Up Own Shop
Will a Market Dominated by Small- to Mid-Cap Deals Give Rise to This Dark Horse US Firm in China?
Big Law Sidelined as Asian IPOs in New York Dominated by Small Cap Listings
Long Hours, Lack Of Boundaries: Associates In India Are Leaving Their Firms
Trending Stories
- 1Doug Emhoff, Husband of Former VP Harris, Lands at Willkie
- 2LexisNexis Announces Public Availability of Personalized AI Assistant Protégé
- 3Some Thoughts on What It Takes to Connect With Millennial Jurors
- 4Artificial Wisdom or Automated Folly? Practical Considerations for Arbitration Practitioners to Address the AI Conundrum
- 5The New Global M&A Kings All Have Something in Common
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250