Unilever invites firms to tender for first ever legal panel
Consumer goods giant Unilever has kicked off a review of its legal advisers, inviting a number of firms to tender for a place on its inaugural legal panel.
March 27, 2014 at 07:46 AM
2 minute read
Consumer goods giant Unilever has kicked off a review of its legal advisers, inviting a number of firms to tender for a place on its inaugural legal panel.
The tender process, which is being organised by operations legal director Saswata Mukherjee, is part of a push by the UK company to formalise its relationships with its major external counsel.
While Slaughter and May has traditionally been the main corporate adviser to Unilever, Linklaters has picked up a number of mandates for the FTSE 100-listed corporate in recent years.
In 2013, Links advised the company on a $5.4bn (£4.5bn) deal to increase its stake in Hindustan Unilever, the publicly listed Indian subsidiary of the consumer goods giant.
The magic circle firm also acted for Unilever on its €390m (£330m) acquisition of an 82% stake in Russian beauty company Concern Kalina in 2011.
The deals followed the appointment in 2010 of former Linklaters partner Tonia Lovell to chief legal officer and company secretary of Unilever, after three years as the company's UK and Ireland general counsel.
However, Slaughters has handled a large portion of major UK deals and finance work, including the headline role on a $1bn (£643m) double-tranche bond issue in 2012 and the €672m (£568m) sale of its Sanex personal care brand to Colgate-Palmolive.
In the US, Unilever has used Slaughters' best friend firm Cravath Swaine & Moore for a number of corporate and tax matters, as well as New York law firm Herrick Feinstein.
Unilever also has strong ties to firms including Mayer Brown and Baker & McKenzie. In February, a Mayer Brown team led by London partner Andrew Stewart advised Unilever on the sale of its Peperami salami sticks to US-based beef jerky maker Jack Link's.
Since 2007, Bakers struck a major deal with Unilever to outsource virtually all of its intellectual property (IP) work to the firm's low-cost offshore operation in Manila, a deal brokered by London head and client relationship partner Paul Rawlinson.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllKirkland, Paul Hastings, White & Case, Freshfields advise on Top German Deals
2 minute readBlocking of $14B Nippon US Steel Deal Will Not Dampen Japan-U.S. M&A, Lawyers Say
Milbank’s Capital Markets Partner Leaves for China’s Han Kun in Hong Kong
Trending Stories
- 1Restoring Trust in the Courts Starts in New York
- 2'Pull Back the Curtain': Ex-NFL Players Seek Discovery in Lawsuit Over League's Disability Plan
- 3Tensions Run High at Final Hearing Before Manhattan Congestion Pricing Takes Effect
- 4Improper Removal to Fed. Court Leads to $100K Bill for Blue Cross Blue Shield
- 5Michael Halpern, Beloved Key West Attorney, Dies at 72
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250