Freshfields and Quinn Emanuel advise as landmark £14bn UK class action enters court
First key hearing in landmark class action against MasterCard gets underway
January 18, 2017 at 07:18 AM
3 minute read
The first key hearing in the landmark class action against MasterCard gets underway today (18 January), with the Competition Appeals Tribunal set to determine whether the case will be certified and can proceed to a full trial.
The record-breaking £14bn claim was brought against MasterCard in September, on behalf of 46 million British debit and credit card holders over the company's charging of illegal payment fees. It is the first major US-style class action in the English courts, following the UK's introduction in 2015 of new legislation allowing 'opt-out' collective damages claims.
MasterCard, which is being advised by Freshfields Bruckhaus Deringer, has during the past decade been embroiled in a series of legal battles over the level of so-called 'interchange' fees it charged businesses on transactions between 1992 and 2007. These fees were found by European authorities to be unlawfully high. The plaintiffs, represented by Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan, argue that part of the cost of these fees was passed on to consumers in the form of increased prices for goods and services.
MasterCard's cross-border interchange fees have already been found to be illegal—the company's long-running challenge to the European Commission's decision was finally put to bed by the Europe's highest court in 2014. Quinn Emanuel will now need to prove that the EC's decision also applies to domestic interchange—essentially, fees incurred when using credit cards in the UK, rather than abroad—and that consumers suffered damages as a result of those fees.
Quinn Emanuel partner Boris Bronfentrinker told The American Lawyer the firm is confident that the claim, which is backed by up to £40m in financing from Chicago-based commercial litigation funder Gerchen Keller Capital – its largest ever investment in non-US litigation – will be allowed to proceed. "The effect of MasterCard's criticisms and submissions would be to make the new collective action regime ineffective for consumers – the very group of people for whose benefit the regime was created."
A MasterCard spokesman said that the company "continues to disagree" with the basis of the claim. "We will be arguing strongly that these claims do not meet the set criteria for a collective action to proceed," he added.
Last summer, Sainsbury's successfully sued MasterCard over its interchange fees and was awarded £68.5m in damages.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllPogust Goodhead Set to Axe Roles as Accounts Remain Overdue
Cuatrecasas Elevates Seven to Partner in Spain and Latin America
Germany’s Wirecard Case Moves to Airport Hangar to Accommodate 100 Lawyers
5 minute readAustralian Corporations More Concerned About Class Actions Risk, HSF Report Finds
3 minute readTrending Stories
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250