EDF Energy begins review of 14-strong UK panel with tech and innovation under scrutiny
EDF launches review with Eversheds Sutherland and HSF among firms under the spotlight
November 17, 2017 at 08:26 AM
2 minute read
EDF Energy has begun a review of its UK panel, with the aim of securing new pricing and service models from its key external advisers.
Chief legal officer Guido Santi is leading the review, which will have an increased focus on technology and innovation.
The energy giant's current panel line-up, which has been in place since 2014, consists of 10 core and four specialist firms. Herbert Smith Freehills (HSF), Eversheds Sutherland, Squire Patton Boggs, Burges Salmon and TLT are understood to be among the company's advisers.
The review began in the last two weeks and is expected to completed in around two to three months. The current line-up is due to expire at the end of the calendar year.
The company has heavily cut back its external legal spend in recent years. In 2014, the firm's total legal advisers dropped from 19 in 2012 to 14, including 10 core firms. In 2012, the roster was reduced from 21 to 19.
A more significant cull took place in 2009, when the firm more than halved its number of external law firms from about 60 to 21. That review took place shortly after EDF took control of UK nuclear generator British Energy.
In the 2014 review, EDF also switched from two-year panel appointments to a three-year cycle.
The review comes after EDF's hire this September of HSF head of power and renewables Julia Pyke, who joined as general counsel of its nuclear new build businesses,
While at HSF, she was one of the main advisers on EDF's £18bn UK nuclear project Hinkley Point C. The firm acted for EDF alongside Pinsent Masons on securing consent to build and operate the nuclear power station.
The controversial development also handed roles to other firms including Clifford Chance, which advised EDF on China National Nuclear Corporation's £6bn investment in the project, and on securing European state aid approval from the European Commission.
- Technology and innovation will be top of the agenda at this month's LegalWeek Connect event, which is taking place on 29-30 November at London's Institution of Engineering and Technology. Click here to find out more.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllNetflix Offices Raided by Authorities in Paris and Amsterdam
Report Spotlights Bullying, Harassment Facing In-House Lawyers
Australian Gambling Machine Giant Hires Insider as CLO, Relocates Her to Las Vegas
Trending Stories
- 1Judicial Ethics Opinion 24-61
- 2Decision of the Day: School District's Probe Was a 'Sham'; Title IX Administrator Showed Sex-Based Bias
- 3US Magistrate Judge Embry Kidd Confirmed to 11th Circuit
- 4Shaq Signs $11 Million Settlement to Resolve Astrals Investor Claims
- 5McCormick Consolidates Two Tesla Chancery Cases
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250