'We do not want a school-like culture' - Slaughters shakes up associate appraisals and drops performance scores
Magic circle firm to appoint dedicated 'continuity' partners to improve associate development
January 25, 2018 at 07:53 AM
4 minute read
Slaughter and May has overhauled its associate appraisal system, with performance scores dropped in favour of more ongoing feedback and mentoring by dedicated 'continuity' partners.
The magic circle firm's associates were previously measured against three categories – legal, business development and interpersonal – but following a six-month review, the firm has decided to drop the points system, which was used to give a numerical indication of the level of performance expected of its associates.
Slaughter and May executive partner Paul Stacey said: "We are dropping all scores for associate appraisals. That was very much driven by associates. Our very clever people, who are working very hard, said: 'We do not want a school-like culture.' We think the problem with scores is that people focus on the numbers, and that's not a helpful way of taking their career forward.
"We want to actually get people to have a proper conversation about their future career and development. When you have that conversation, while we will recall how well people have done, the other focus will be on looking forward to see how your career as an associate is developing."
Slaughters has been working with leadership and talent consultancy MDV on the review, which kicked off in the summer last year and concluded this month. Associates and partners were invited to provide input for the review at two focus groups, with the results of those meetings presented in September.
While the firm has decided to retain annual appraisals, it is also bringing in more ongoing feedback for associates alongside the appointment of 'continuity' partners to oversee their development.
The continuity partners, who are set to be appointed in March, will take long-term responsibility for mentoring associates. "The continuity partners will sit down and be with associates over a number of years and attend their annual reviews," Stacey explains. "We want to provide continuity in that review. Both the continuity partner and the partner that has worked most closely with an associate will be present at the appraisal."
For many associates, a mentoring arrangement already exists, and these partners will be assigned as their continuity partners, but in other larger groups, they will be introduced for the first time.
Partners will be encouraged to provide feedback to associates either at the end of transactions if they are shorter, such as M&A or financing deals, or at key points during a longer mandate, such as an ongoing investigation.
Stacey added: "Associates need to know how they are doing in the moment, rather than at the end of the year."
Last year Slaughters moved away from performance-based pay for junior lawyers, with the associate pay system now mirroring the flat lockstep structure of the firm's partnership.
The appraisal process remains unlinked to pay, and there will also be no formal targets put into place under the new system. "We are not a target-based culture," Stacey said. "We will have a conversation with associates about how they can develop their careers and take forward their legal, business and interpersonal skills."
In addition, the firm has introduced 'recovery time' to ensure that associates working long hours on transactions are given back hours in lieu. The idea was first raised in July as part of the appraisal review and officially launched in September.
"Our partners are given recovery time guidance to make sure there is consistency across associates. We have systems that generate this information, and it goes to the partners who then decide the appropriate amount of time off for the associates."
Last year Slaughters introduced a raft of other benefits for associates, including a four-week paid sabbatical at three years' post-qualification experience (PQE), as well as the opportunity to work from home one day a week.
In December the firm announced associate salary increases, with newly qualified lawyers now paid £80,000 and lawyers with one year's PQE receiving £88,000. 2PQE and 3PQE associates are paid £98,500 and £108,000 respectively.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllUK Solicitors Regulator Sets Unusual Practice Conditions on AIG In-House Lawyer
Insurance Practice DWF Takes Team of 53 Lawyers From Australian Firm
2 minute readA&O Shearman, White & Case Advise on €1.2B Public Takeover of German Steel Giant Salzgitter
3 minute readResolute Mining Appoints London General Counsel—CEO Resigns Following Foreign Detention
Trending Stories
- 1Public Notices/Calendars
- 2Wednesday Newspaper
- 3Decision of the Day: Qui Tam Relators Do Not Plausibly Claim Firm Avoided Tax Obligations Through Visa Applications, Circuit Finds
- 4Judicial Ethics Opinion 24-116
- 5Big Law Firms Sheppard Mullin, Morgan Lewis and Baker Botts Add Partners in Houston
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250