Linklaters becomes first magic circle firm to reveal gender pay gap data
Firm's male employees earn nearly 60% more in bonuses than women, data shows
February 07, 2018 at 08:55 AM
3 minute read
Linklaters' male employees are earning nearly 60% more in bonuses than women, according to the firm's first gender pay report.
The report shows that while marginally more women (78%) than men (76%) received a bonus in the year to April 2017, men received on average 58% more in bonuses than women.
Average hourly pay is skewed in favour of men by 23%, rising to a difference of nearly 40% using a median average.
The firm is the first of the magic circle to report its gender pay gap data, ahead of an April reporting deadline for all companies employing more than 250 people. Law firms are not required to provide data about partners.
Linklaters has not separated the pay gap data between fee earners and support staff; however, the firm's report notes that average pay for women across the firm is significantly impacted by the high number of female employees in its lowest earning group.
Just under 80% of those in its lowest pay quartile are women, as are 56% of those in the lower middle quartile. In contrast, women make up 45% of the upper quartile.
Explaining the significant difference in bonus pay between men and women, the report states: "Significantly more of our female colleagues work on a part-time basis than our male colleagues, which has had an impact on our bonus gap because the government has specified that bonus figures are calculated based on actual amounts paid, rather than on a full-time equivalent basis.
"While we still have some way to go, the gender balance in our upper, upper-middle and lower-middle pay quartiles is encouraging evidence that our efforts over recent years to attract and retain women in more senior roles have begun to pay off."
The report also sets out details of the firm's gender breakdown at more senior levels. Twenty-three percent of the firm's UK partners are women, alongside 42% of its executive committee, 23% of its partnership board and 43% of its director group.
Linklaters' disclosure comes after CMS, Herbert Smith Freehills and Shoosmiths last month became the first UK top 50 law firms to publish details of their gender pay gaps.
At CMS, the average UK hourly rate for women is 17.3% lower than men, marginally better than the UK-wide average of 18%. Bonus pay for women is on average 26.9% lower than men. At Shoosmiths, the pay gap is smaller, with the average hourly rate for women 15.4% lower than men. For bonus pay, the difference in mean earnings is 18%.
HSF's pay gap data, meanwhile, revealed that the firm paid out 30% less in bonuses to its female employees than its male employees last year, alongside a near 20% gender pay gap in average hourly earnings between men and women.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllUK Black History Month: Four A&O Shearman Staffers Honour Their Unsung Heroes
6 minute read'But We Exist': The Stigma Around Disability and Neurodivergence in Law Firms Persists
6 minute readTrending Stories
- 1As Political Extremism Rises, is Voter Data the Next Privacy Frontier?
- 2So You Want to be a Tech Lawyer? Consider Product Counseling
- 3US District Judge in North Carolina Will Take Senior Status
- 4From 'Confusing Labyrinth' to Speeding 'Roller Coaster': Uncertainty Reigns in Title IX as Litigators Await Second Trump Admin
- 5Critical Mass With Law.com’s Amanda Bronstad: Why Jurors in California Failed to Reach Verdict Over Zantac, Bankruptcy Judge Tables Sanctions Against Beasley Allen Attorney
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250