Microsoft and Cisco Test the Waters With AI Contract Management Pilot Programs
Pilot projects help uncover the usefulness and limitations of artificial intelligence technology for contracts before committing significant resources and time.
May 15, 2017 at 02:38 PM
4 minute read
Artificial intelligence is far from a magic bullet that will solve all of corporate legal's challenges or take over most of their responsibilities. But for many companies, AI can play a key role in enabling them to provide more cost-effective services. And perhaps nowhere is this more possible currently than in the area of contract management.
But while there are legal departments who have streamlined their entire contracting work through AI, many departments are taking a slower approach, cognizant of the challenges inherent in larger AI implementations. Speaking at various sessions at Corporate Legal Operations Consortium's (CLOC) recent annual institute in Las Vegas, legal operations professionals from Microsoft and Cisco shed light on their AI contract management pilots and why, right now, they're just testing the waters.
Tami Baddeley, operations lead, legal operations and contracting at Microsoft, for example, noted that her team is dipping its toes into contract AI technology with a six-month pilot project that leverages AI to analyze the contracts of its top 21 strategic partners. “We did a limited data set, so we are looking at 500 contracts. As we go through them, what we are looking for is, what are the terms that are common and what does our relationship look like based on these agreements?”
The goal of the pilot, she said, is to ensure that “in-house attorneys are no longer hunting for what their relationship looks like” and are instead focusing on higher-level work. The project will mainly be executed in conjunction with Pramata, Microsoft's contract management vendor, which will analyze Microsoft's contract data off-site using AI technology then send back reports to the company.
Deploying this relatively quick and small-scale pilot was pivotal for Microsoft as it looked to consider a larger AI contract management implementation because of the significant costs of such a project.
Baddeley noted that Microsoft wanted to first see how an AI contract management solution could work to benefit the legal department and work out its problems before committing any dedicated resources to a departmentwide deployment. Funding AI contract management solutions, after all, is not a one-time expense, but an “ongoing resourcing effort” that requires continuous funding, Baddeley said.
Mike Naughton, senior manager of legal shared solutions at Cisco, agreed: “This is not cheap; this is not something you will have to bang out in your spare time.” Like Microsoft, Cisco is developing a pilot to test how AI contract management solutions can streamline its contracting work. Cisco's efforts are preliminary and are aimed at testing the waters before potentially approving a more widespread, and expensive, implementation.
But cost isn't the only reason Cisco is taking it slow with contract AI. The company has also launched a second pilot to “get our hands on AI directly and see what it was capable of,” Naughton said.
The goal of this second pilot, he explained, was to “analyze individual contracts first without sending them to an intermediary vendor for processing or to an attorney to review. I wanted to see how AI [can] work on its own.”
As the first stage of this pilot, Cisco looked to apply AI to nondisclosure agreements (NDAs). Because NDAs are fairly short and simple contracts that are created and reviewed in high volumes, Naughton explained, using AI technology to streamline NDA processing can have obvious, quick benefits for any legal department.
Cisco's legal team turned to Riverview Law, whom they are partnering with on their first pilot, to “set up an inbox where [the legal team] can drop an NDA in and within five minutes get an assessment of how the NDA fits within the standard,” Naughton said. He added that the assessment was directed by “what we call 'a cheat sheet,' which are really simple [instructions] around how we handle simple NDA terms.”
For Cisco, the second pilot was important in not only showing the legal team the abilities and limitations of AI contract solutions running independently, but also in allowing it to understand how to use AI in a more agile, targeted way before a more burdensome departmentwide implementation.
Naughton noted that the company's pilot is an example other companies can follow to bring AI down to size and fit within their own workflows without having to first commit significant resources or organize all their contracts beforehand. Such a test project is important to those in the industry who “need to apply AI to the real world and don't want to be doing some abstract AI [processes offsite],” he said.
Copyright Legaltech News. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllTrending Stories
- 1Call for Nominations: Elite Trial Lawyers 2025
- 2Senate Judiciary Dems Release Report on Supreme Court Ethics
- 3Senate Confirms Last 2 of Biden's California Judicial Nominees
- 4Morrison & Foerster Doles Out Year-End and Special Bonuses, Raises Base Compensation for Associates
- 5Tom Girardi to Surrender to Federal Authorities on Jan. 7
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250