The Power of LDA Algorithms and How They Help Text Mine Your Documents
LDA can work its wonders on any set of documents: client satisfaction comments, documents obtained in discovery or due diligence, annual reports and more.
June 08, 2017 at 09:00 AM
8 minute read
With text-mining software, which finds patterns and insights from collections of documents, one powerful capability identifies related words. The software models the words in a corpus (all the documents) into topics. Latent Dirichlet Allocation (LDA) is one of the algorithms which carries out such topic modeling. In the legal industry, LDA can work its wonders on any set of documents: client satisfaction comments, documents obtained in discovery or due diligence, annual reports, hot line replies, survey answers, and other sources.
An Example of LDA
Let's start with an actual set of documents and see how LDA performs. The author gathered self-descriptions by thirty U.S. law firms, as in what they might use in recruitment brochures. Each self-description runs at least 150 words. After removing trivial words, we used LDA from a package of the open-source R language and told it to model five topics. The table below lays out the 10 words the software most closely associated with each topic, in declining order within each topic.
Topic 1 appears to address client service and value (“provide,” “providing,” “value”); Topic 2 suggests depth of experience (“services,” “years,” “leading”); Topic 3 is the bragging topic (“recognize”, “top,” “best,” “ranked”); Topic 4 focuses on substantive practices (“litigation,” “real,” “estate,” “regulation”); and Topic 5 on engagement of lawyers (“pro” “bono”). Obviously, readers might pick alternative themes for the topics, but at least it the software assembles large amounts of text and isolating the key words. The software does not suggest a concept that pertains to the topics it creates.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllTrending Stories
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250