3 New Technology Positions Finding a Foothold in Modern Legal
A legal week panel discusses growing technology careers paths in legal outside of the e-discovery and cybersecurity bastions.
June 12, 2017 at 06:24 PM
5 minute read
Technology's impact on the legal industry is spurring a growing market for new in-house talent — and its not just in e-discovery or cybersecurity. At Legalweek West's “New Roles in IT for Law Firms and Legal Departments,” speakers shed light on several new and less-noticed jobs currently blooming at law firms and legal departments.
Below are three new positions that many may soon see at their offices:
Innovation and Technology Solutions Attorney
As an innovation and technology solutions attorney at Cooley, Brad Newman, the firm's official practice innovation manager, is tasked with directing his firms' technology aspirations and goals.
“I'm constantly evaluating and staying up to speed on emerging technology, obviously with a focus on legal tech, but keeping an eye on technologies outside our bubble to see if they may [be] applicable to legal,” he said.
Through this foresight Newman seeks to position Cooley to better understand and implement new tools ahead of others. “I was fortunate enough to clue into blockchain technology a few year ago now,” he noted. “So it hasn't been much of a shock to my system or anyone at Cooley.”
By his own admission, being an innovation and technology solutions attorney means being fluent in all technology matters— though it doesn't require having a high-level of technical skill. “Having a strong familiarity with the concepts of core technologies is important,” Newman said. “I don't think you need to learn how to code a contract, but understanding code languages at a fundamental level is key.
Innovation and technology solutions attorneys also need “the ability to separate the hype from reality,” he added. “I spend 20 percent of my time now fielding inquiries from AI,” telling interested colleagues, “'Yes it's important— no it's not really there yet.' I almost have a template email for that.”
Yet having technology experience and acumen is only a part of the necessary prerequisites. Newman advised that those applying for such a position would also need “a J.D. with at least two years of law firm practice experience.”
The reason, he explained, is that innovation and technology solutions attorneys need to fundamentally understand how and where technology can fit into attorney's work and expectations. “You have to do more than just empathize or understand that lawyers are busy. There is a big benefit to understanding what they're busy with, not just on a general level but really putting yourself in their shoes and the best way to do that is having lived in those shoes.”
Data Scientist
For Julian Tsisin, Google's legal technology and systems manager, data scientists are a pivotal part of any modern law firm or legal department. The position is a “hugely popular job today” in the U.S. economy, he said, because of data scientist's ability to interpret and understand data more deeply than analysts and similar information sciences professionals.
“Data analysts live in the structured world; so all of us from law firms and companies we all live in SQL [ Structured Query Language] and tables,” working with data that is classified and tagged, he explained. But “data scientists are not constrained by structure; they go out and try to figure out what's there in the unstructured world of data.”
Their skill is most helpful within legal, where attorneys regularly intake all types of unstructured data from documents to e-discovery data. But figuring out how to make sense and gain insights from that unorganized data, however, is no easy or exciting task.
“Data scientist's job sounds very cool, but 80 percent of what data scientists do is [called] wrangling data, [which is] looking at how to get data from different sources, how to clean that data, how to get it into formal shape so you can run analysis on it,” Tsisin said.
To be sure, data scientists can do a whole lot more. Many, who have broad experience in some of the most technical and complex aspects of information sciences, are also reguarly tasked with acting as their law firm or business' oracle.
“Data analysts today, all of us run historical reports and historical analytics looking back and trying to figure out why [an event's] happening or how it happened,” Tsisin said. On the other hand, “What data scientists try to do is predict the future,” he added. “They look at structured and unstructured and predict behavior going forward.”
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllTrending Stories
- 1Uber Files RICO Suit Against Plaintiff-Side Firms Alleging Fraudulent Injury Claims
- 2The Law Firm Disrupted: Scrutinizing the Elephant More Than the Mouse
- 3Inherent Diminished Value Damages Unavailable to 3rd-Party Claimants, Court Says
- 4Pa. Defense Firm Sued by Client Over Ex-Eagles Player's $43.5M Med Mal Win
- 5Losses Mount at Morris Manning, but Departing Ex-Chair Stays Bullish About His Old Firm's Future
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250