Achieving Cultural Alignment After a Legal Tech Merger
Ari Kaplan spoke with Lighthouse eDiscovery's Brian McManus about the aftermath of the company's merger with Discovia and more.
July 05, 2017 at 09:00 AM
4 minute read
Editor's Note: This is an excerpt from the Reinventing Professionals podcast, hosted by legal technology speaker and consultant Ari Kaplan, provided to Legaltech News. In this episode, Kaplan spoke with Brian McManus, the CEO of Lighthouse eDiscovery, a provider of technology-enabled e-discovery and consulting services, which recently merged with Discovia, a company that provides similar technology and services. Although Lighthouse eDiscovery is not a client of Ari Kaplan Advisors LLC, it has been a subscriber to the consulting firm's E-Discovery Unfiltered market research series.
Ari Kaplan: Lighthouse recently merged with Discovia. How has that combination impacted what you offer your clients?
Brian McManus: Discovia is a very complementary business to ours, and that benefits our clients in that the organization now has more skill and a deeper set of talent able to help them solve their problems. Two of the things that we feel particularly excited about are that one, we have a much bigger consulting team to help our clients tackle the problems they are having with information governance, and data migration to the cloud and Office 365. And two, we have a much deeper set of engineering resources, which allow us to further automate the platforms that we utilize to create customized solutions for our clients, like our smart series portal.
AK: How have changes in the industry increased the demand for more dynamic consulting?
BM: There are just so many new data types and an evolution of data to the cloud and Office 365. Specifically, Microsoft's acquisition of Equivio and the integration of e-discovery functionality into Office 365 is revolutionizing the industry. Compliance, legal and risk management teams together with their respective IT groups are struggling with how to manage all of this data and migrate it to the cloud simultaneously.
AK: How does the merger with Discovia reflect the changing nature of consolidation in the legal market?
BM: I think there's been a move towards scale. As clients have become more sophisticated and data types have become more complex, companies have recognized that the smaller, local e-discovery shops that were a big part of the industry five to ten years ago have struggled to keep up. There is more of a focus on data security and robustness that comes with larger organizations.
AK: Who ultimately benefits from the combination of teams like Lighthouse and Discovia?
BM: I think the clients benefit. They get access to a lot more talent and experience under one brand name, with the ability to handle end-to-end problems from the conceptualization of how to deal with their data to plans for managing their information throughout the process.
AK: How do you foresee the integration of these two cultures taking place?
BM: One of the benefits of this combination is that the cultures are very similar. The two companies are quality and client service focused. No integration is ever easy. This is the seventh acquisition I have done as a CEO (the first one at Lighthouse), and they all present challenges, so this one will be no different. I do think that the cultures are so similar that we will be able to get through the integration phase more quickly than most, and without as many bumps in the road as sometimes occur in the process.
AK: Where do you see the legal services and e-discovery market headed?
BM: I think legal departments are going to start really standardizing on Office 365 and tools that integrate well with Office 365 in an effort to manage data sitting in two places, both in the cloud and behind corporate firewalls.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllTrending Stories
- 1Call for Nominations: Elite Trial Lawyers 2025
- 2Senate Judiciary Dems Release Report on Supreme Court Ethics
- 3Senate Confirms Last 2 of Biden's California Judicial Nominees
- 4Morrison & Foerster Doles Out Year-End and Special Bonuses, Raises Base Compensation for Associates
- 5Tom Girardi to Surrender to Federal Authorities on Jan. 7
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250