A woman who shared pictures on Facebook that her former employer Victoria’s Secret found offensive may have intended to be funny and protest against racism, but a federal appeals court ruled the retail company was not wrong to fire her.
A three-judge panel of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit on Wednesday denied plaintiff Mindy Caplan’s bid to have her retaliation claims against the retail chain reinstated. The nonprecedential decision in Caplan v. L Brands/Victoria’s Secret Stores affirmed a ruling from the U.S. District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.
For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]
