Will Facebook's New 'Colorful Balloons' App Survive China's Regulators?
After Facebook and its related proprietary apps were banned in China, the company looks for a new way through the country's regulatory regime.Facebook…
August 17, 2017 at 07:34 PM
3 minute read
The original version of this story was published on Law.com
After Facebook and its related proprietary apps were banned in China, the company looks for a new way through the country's regulatory regime.
Facebook is behind a new photo-sharing app which is reportedly being tested in China. Named “Colorful Balloons,” the new app comes after China previously banned Facebook in 2009. Other Facebook-owned apps, such as Instagram and WhatsApp apps, are prohibited in the nation as well.
The launch of the new app, which does not use the company's name, was first reported by The New York Times and highlights the importance Facebook places on the Chinese market.
In a recent statement to Legaltech News, a Facebook spokesperson said: “We have long said that we are interested in China and are spending time understanding and learning more about the country in different ways. Our focus right now is on helping Chinese businesses and developers expand to new markets outside China by using our ad platform.”
The latest move by Facebook is also considered important for attorneys and legal departments of tech companies to watch for a host of data privacy and business issues.
John P. Pironti, president of IP Architects noted that attorneys and legal departments “should closely monitor this situation to understand how they may be able to develop and distribute applications in China and to Chinese nationals with fewer hurdles.”
“Tech companies will still be required to follow all laws and regulations in China but may be able to navigate them better by using a local corporate entity instead of working through their offshore offices,” he added.
Moreover, Peter Micek, a lecturer at Columbia University's School of International and Public Affairs said that “transfer of data from one jurisdiction to another—like China or Europe to the U.S.—is a red-hot issue in many regions of the world.”
“Users in China should be aware and consent to the transfer and processing of their data by third parties across oceans,” he said. “Expectations on companies to transparently account for their data collection and processing are rising fast outside the U.S. It's only a matter of time before those standards are brought to bear here.”
“Second, lawyers for tech companies need to interface closely with public policy experts who understand the governance and regulatory dynamics where they operate,” he added. “Especially when introducing new products or services, you need to know much more than just what's legal, but what's acceptable. You could easily put your staff, partners, or users at risk without due diligence into the red lines of key officials and regulators.”
Looking ahead, Pironti said the Chinese government “will most likely review the app—if it has not done so already—to ensure it does not violate any regulations or legal requirements for use within China or by Chinese nationals.”
“If they find the app to be in compliance, it is likely they will allow [it] to continue to be distributed,” he predicted. “At the same time, they will mostly likely take note of this approach and possibly require more transparency by app developers and distributors about the organizations [that] are involved with the apps that are being distributed within China or to Chinese nationals.”
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllTrending Stories
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250