Will Facebook's New 'Colorful Balloons' App Survive China's Regulators?
After Facebook and its related proprietary apps were banned in China, the company looks for a new way through the country's regulatory regime.Facebook…
August 17, 2017 at 07:34 PM
3 minute read
The original version of this story was published on Law.com
After Facebook and its related proprietary apps were banned in China, the company looks for a new way through the country's regulatory regime.
Facebook is behind a new photo-sharing app which is reportedly being tested in China. Named “Colorful Balloons,” the new app comes after China previously banned Facebook in 2009. Other Facebook-owned apps, such as Instagram and WhatsApp apps, are prohibited in the nation as well.
The launch of the new app, which does not use the company's name, was first reported by The New York Times and highlights the importance Facebook places on the Chinese market.
In a recent statement to Legaltech News, a Facebook spokesperson said: “We have long said that we are interested in China and are spending time understanding and learning more about the country in different ways. Our focus right now is on helping Chinese businesses and developers expand to new markets outside China by using our ad platform.”
The latest move by Facebook is also considered important for attorneys and legal departments of tech companies to watch for a host of data privacy and business issues.
John P. Pironti, president of IP Architects noted that attorneys and legal departments “should closely monitor this situation to understand how they may be able to develop and distribute applications in China and to Chinese nationals with fewer hurdles.”
“Tech companies will still be required to follow all laws and regulations in China but may be able to navigate them better by using a local corporate entity instead of working through their offshore offices,” he added.
Moreover, Peter Micek, a lecturer at Columbia University's School of International and Public Affairs said that “transfer of data from one jurisdiction to another—like China or Europe to the U.S.—is a red-hot issue in many regions of the world.”
“Users in China should be aware and consent to the transfer and processing of their data by third parties across oceans,” he said. “Expectations on companies to transparently account for their data collection and processing are rising fast outside the U.S. It's only a matter of time before those standards are brought to bear here.”
“Second, lawyers for tech companies need to interface closely with public policy experts who understand the governance and regulatory dynamics where they operate,” he added. “Especially when introducing new products or services, you need to know much more than just what's legal, but what's acceptable. You could easily put your staff, partners, or users at risk without due diligence into the red lines of key officials and regulators.”
Looking ahead, Pironti said the Chinese government “will most likely review the app—if it has not done so already—to ensure it does not violate any regulations or legal requirements for use within China or by Chinese nationals.”
“If they find the app to be in compliance, it is likely they will allow [it] to continue to be distributed,” he predicted. “At the same time, they will mostly likely take note of this approach and possibly require more transparency by app developers and distributors about the organizations [that] are involved with the apps that are being distributed within China or to Chinese nationals.”
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllTrending Stories
- 1Some Thoughts on What It Takes to Connect With Millennial Jurors
- 2Artificial Wisdom or Automated Folly? Practical Considerations for Arbitration Practitioners to Address the AI Conundrum
- 3The New Global M&A Kings All Have Something in Common
- 4Big Law Aims to Make DEI Less Divisive in Trump's Second Term
- 5Public Notices/Calendars
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250