How to Transform the Business of Law with Cognitive Computing
Ari Kaplan speaks with the co-leaders of IBM Watson Legal about what AI means practically and its actual applications.
August 25, 2017 at 09:00 AM
4 minute read
Editor's Note: This is an excerpt from the Reinventing Professionals podcast, hosted by legal technology speaker and consultant Ari Kaplan, provided to Legaltech News. In this episode, Kaplan spoke with Shawnna Hoffman and Brian Kuhn, the co-founders and co-leaders of IBM Watson Legal. The duo delivered the day two keynote address at the 2017 ILTA conference.
Ari Kaplan: Tell us about your ILTACON keynote message.
Brian Kuhn: Our message really focused on the practical application of AI to the legal industry, not flash or Star Wars, not the art of the possible, but what can be done and what the tools are for evaluating how to do something.
Ari Kaplan: Where are the practical aspects of AI?
Brian Kuhn: We've conducted over 100 use case identification workshops with potential clients in Asia, Europe, and North America. We used four metrics to rank the potential business benefit of a use case and then built solutions around those metrics. Where we are seeing those use cases the most is in business of law, rather than practice of law. While we are not focused on the practice of law, we are enhancing it with AI. We are focused on the business of law, such as a reduction in outside counsel spend and repurposing previous work product.
Ari Kaplan: How close are we to actual application of this technology?
Shawnna Hoffman: It is happening today. It's actually been happening for quite some time. We've been building over the past five years different legal solutions and really understanding what the marketplace was looking for. What we've found is that the biggest pain points today involve the business of law issues. It's the day-to-day things that are annoying for the attorneys to have to do. Billing, for example, is just tremendously annoying. No one goes to law school to learn how to do an invoice right. We found that 40 percent of the time the UTBMS (Uniform Task Based Management System) codes are incorrect.
Brian Kuhn: We actually invented a tool called Outside Counsel Insights to support this. 10 different lawyers would describe the same similar legal scenario and the same billable event in 10 different ways and that varies from jurisdiction to jurisdiction. By more clearly understanding what they do, we can get a sense of what a reasonable level of effort is for a certain type of legal task and move forward with a fixed fee billing.
Ari Kaplan: What was the takeaway that you were trying to emphasize in the keynote?
Shawnna Hoffman: It definitely is the practical application of artificial intelligence and taking it in bite-sized pieces. Don't go in and try to boil the ocean. In the end, it's a piece by piece effort and trying to move the needle a bit. Most of the time, it's millions of dollars that AI can come in and save.
Brian Kuhn: I think another message was that the industry needs to come together to define a standard for the practical and ethical application of this technology, not just vendors, but the industry itself.
Ari Kaplan: How do you overcome the fear and anxiety over machines handling this?
Shawnna Hoffman: Here is the cool part about that: the jobs that we've been able to affect so far are the ones that no one wants to do. It's kind of like the industrial revolution since Watson will do the repeatable processes that you hate.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllTrending Stories
- 1Blockchain’s Fourth and Fifth Amendment Privacy Paradoxes
- 2Prior Written Notice: Calabrese v. City of Albany
- 3Learning From Experience: The Best and Worst of Years Past
- 4Treasury GC Returns to Davis Polk to Co-Chair White-Collar Defense and Investigations Practice
- 5Decision of the Day: JFK to Paris Stowaway's Bail Revocation Explained
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250