Uber Employees Might Bring Their Own Devices. Should Other Companies Have BYOD?
Former Uber Technologies Inc. CEO Travis Kalanick indicated recently that the company may allow personal laptops at work. One device that potentially…
August 30, 2017 at 04:24 PM
4 minute read
The original version of this story was published on Law.com
Former Uber Technologies Inc. CEO Travis Kalanick indicated recently that the company may allow personal laptops at work. One device that potentially made it inside Uber's campus came from self-driving car engineer Anthony Levandowski, whose digital files are currently at the center of Uber's dispute over driverless car technology with Alphabet Inc. subsidiary Waymo.
Uber is not the first and it certainly won't be the last company to have personal devices in the office. It's a growing trend that's all but impossible to fight, according to in-house lawyers, making it all the more important to protect against the risks.
Kalanick's revelation came in a July 27 deposition, released earlier this month in the company's lawsuit with Waymo. Asked whether he knew that Levandowski took a personal laptop to work, Kalanick said he was not aware of this because he's “not in the weeds of that kind of stuff.” The ex-CEO went on to say he doesn't believe it's prohibited to bring personal laptops to work—”maybe it happens with some employees”—but it's not “a normal thing.”
Uber did not immediately respond to request for comment on the company's policy around personal devices, but it wouldn't be out of the ordinary if the ride-hailing giant does allow their use.
It's pretty much the “new normal” that people have personal devices with them at work and, to some extent, that they are encouraged by companies to bring them, said Sterling Miller, general counsel at marketing automation software company Marketo Inc.
“As a general counsel, I would say it is a risky place to be,” Miller said. “But I think there's probably no turning back from the tide and rather than trying to fight it … I think you just need to accept that this is the way it's going to be and do what you can to minimize the risks.”
The risks, Miller said, range from an inability to quickly wipe personal devices when people leave the company, to devices that don't have the same firewall and anti-virus protections in place as those that are company-issued, which can open the company up to an intrusion.
And then there are wage-and-hour issues, Miller said. “How am I tracking my time if I'm an hourly employee and I'm using a personal device?” he questioned. “That's a real problem that usually only becomes known when there's an issue,” he said.
Where personal device use is concerned, the typical scenario is that employees bring their own smartphones and perhaps tablets, but employees aren't, for the most part, bringing their own laptops to work, said Josh King, chief legal officer of online legal marketplace Avvo Inc. But no matter the devices used, he added, there are certainly additional considerations for in-house counsel.
King offered employee relations issues as an example. He said in a workforce where employees can share media “seamlessly and simply,” it can open up “all sorts of frontiers,” allowing workers to share inappropriate images, for instance.
To mitigate the risks, legal departments should have a hand in drafting personal device policies, outlining, for example, what types of passwords are required, how frequently to change them and probably most importantly—”the wipe clean policy,” Miller said.
According to Miller, policies need to be very clear on the fact that personal devices that touch company systems are subject to company monitoring and could get turned over in litigation. “And then lastly, you have got to have a clear statement around the wage-and-hour issue,” he said.
And then companies have to not only ensure employees are trained on what expectations are, but also need to put in place certain physical tools when necessary, King said. If you have a policy against downloading work documents and taking them home, for example, “you need to create the physical tools in your networks that prevent people from doing that,” he said.
King likened the use of personal devices in the workplace to when the use of email was becoming popular in the '90s. There was a lot of discussion in the legal profession about how risky it was and then “someone flipped a switch and you couldn't worry about it anymore,” he explained. “As a profession, we just had to adapt to that and understand that this was a form of heightened insecurity.”
“I feel like there's a lot of similarities with bring you own devices, as well,” King said. “We can try to fight it, we can try to put procedures in place, but we're not going to stop it.”
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllTrending Stories
- 1Judge Grants Special Counsel's Motion, Dismisses Criminal Case Against Trump Without Prejudice
- 2GEICO, Travelers to Pay NY $11.3M for Cybersecurity Breaches
- 3'Professional Misconduct': Maryland Supreme Court Disbars 86-Year-Old Attorney
- 4Capital Markets Partners Expect IPO Resurgence During Trump Administration
- 5Chief Assistant District Attorney and Litigator Shortlisted for Paulding County Judgeship
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250