Nebraska Firm Details How It Will Accept Bitcoin Payment Following Court Opinion
The Nebraska Supreme Court said in its opinion that it is ethical for attorneys in Nebraska to receive digital currency such as bitcoin as payments.
September 29, 2017 at 03:53 PM
3 minute read
By Carley Meiners Beckum
At least one law firm in Nebraska is preparing to soon accept payment in bitcoins following an opinion that gives a formal approval to the payment method.
The Lawyer's Advisory Committee appointed by the Nebraska Supreme Court said in its opinion that it is ethical for attorneys in Nebraska to receive digital currency such as bitcoin as payments and to also hold them in trust for clients.
Copple, Rockey, McKeever & Schlecht requested the opinion and plans on starting to accept bitcoins next month, after ensuring they comply with the recently-released opinion.
“We plan on complying with the opinion by using a third-party payment processor that uses Bitcoin, such as Coinbase (San Francisco) or BitPay (Atlanta),” attorney Matthew McKeever told Legaltech News. “When a client makes a payment using Bitcoin, the bitcoins will be immediately converted into U.S. dollars and ACH wire transferred to the firm's account at least every two business days.”
McKeever noted that the change will require no further internal IT, but perhaps a change to the firm's financial structure. “We may change our billing agreements to explicitly state that payments may be made in Bitcoin. The payment page on our website will include a button where clients can pay with Bitcoin. We will also likely have a statement on [the] Bitcoin payment page that any return of money to the client will be in U.S. dollars, not bitcoins,” he said.
Copple, Rockey, McKeever & Schlecht, requested the opinion to be “absolutely sure” they could take bitcoin and see what rules would apply, McKeever explained.
The advisory committee also gave interested law firms specific advice in its recent opinion:
- To avoid any overpayment by clients, the attorney will not retain the digital currency but will convert them into U.S. dollars immediately upon receipt (so lawyers can avoid being unfairly compensated);
- The conversion will take place immediately by using a payment processor; and
- The client's account will be credited at the time of payment.
Also, an attorney may hold bitcoins and other digital currencies in escrow or trust for clients or third parties, according to the opinion.
One of the other warnings of the opinion is to know your client. At his firm, they ask new clients to fill out an information sheet and the firm does its due diligence to confirm the information, McKeever said.
“These things need to be done whether [a firm] accepts bitcoin or not,” McKeever explained. Any suspicious activity is reported to proper authorities.
McKeever added, “A number of firms are taking bitcoin already in the U.S. Twenty to 30 that I know of.”
None are under an advisory opinion or regulations from a local bar association, he said, so he believes the Nebraska opinion is the first of its kind in the nation. This isn't surprising, as parts of Nebraska are now known as “Silicon Prairie” because of the many financial technology companies in Lincoln and Omaha. McKeever explained that his firm has many clients who work in the blockchain or bitcoin sectors.
He doesn't think that other states will likely issue their own opinions about whether attorneys can accept bitcoins, but may rely on the Nebraska opinion. Other states that also use similar Rules of Professional Conduct may use the Nebraska opinion as a guideline for their own legal activities, McKeever explained.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllTrending Stories
- 1Call for Nominations: Elite Trial Lawyers 2025
- 2Senate Judiciary Dems Release Report on Supreme Court Ethics
- 3Senate Confirms Last 2 of Biden's California Judicial Nominees
- 4Morrison & Foerster Doles Out Year-End and Special Bonuses, Raises Base Compensation for Associates
- 5Tom Girardi to Surrender to Federal Authorities on Jan. 7
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250