Nebraska Firm Details How It Will Accept Bitcoin Payment Following Court Opinion
The Nebraska Supreme Court said in its opinion that it is ethical for attorneys in Nebraska to receive digital currency such as bitcoin as payments.
September 29, 2017 at 03:53 PM
3 minute read
By Carley Meiners Beckum
At least one law firm in Nebraska is preparing to soon accept payment in bitcoins following an opinion that gives a formal approval to the payment method.
The Lawyer's Advisory Committee appointed by the Nebraska Supreme Court said in its opinion that it is ethical for attorneys in Nebraska to receive digital currency such as bitcoin as payments and to also hold them in trust for clients.
Copple, Rockey, McKeever & Schlecht requested the opinion and plans on starting to accept bitcoins next month, after ensuring they comply with the recently-released opinion.
“We plan on complying with the opinion by using a third-party payment processor that uses Bitcoin, such as Coinbase (San Francisco) or BitPay (Atlanta),” attorney Matthew McKeever told Legaltech News. “When a client makes a payment using Bitcoin, the bitcoins will be immediately converted into U.S. dollars and ACH wire transferred to the firm's account at least every two business days.”
McKeever noted that the change will require no further internal IT, but perhaps a change to the firm's financial structure. “We may change our billing agreements to explicitly state that payments may be made in Bitcoin. The payment page on our website will include a button where clients can pay with Bitcoin. We will also likely have a statement on [the] Bitcoin payment page that any return of money to the client will be in U.S. dollars, not bitcoins,” he said.
Copple, Rockey, McKeever & Schlecht, requested the opinion to be “absolutely sure” they could take bitcoin and see what rules would apply, McKeever explained.
The advisory committee also gave interested law firms specific advice in its recent opinion:
- To avoid any overpayment by clients, the attorney will not retain the digital currency but will convert them into U.S. dollars immediately upon receipt (so lawyers can avoid being unfairly compensated);
- The conversion will take place immediately by using a payment processor; and
- The client's account will be credited at the time of payment.
Also, an attorney may hold bitcoins and other digital currencies in escrow or trust for clients or third parties, according to the opinion.
One of the other warnings of the opinion is to know your client. At his firm, they ask new clients to fill out an information sheet and the firm does its due diligence to confirm the information, McKeever said.
“These things need to be done whether [a firm] accepts bitcoin or not,” McKeever explained. Any suspicious activity is reported to proper authorities.
McKeever added, “A number of firms are taking bitcoin already in the U.S. Twenty to 30 that I know of.”
None are under an advisory opinion or regulations from a local bar association, he said, so he believes the Nebraska opinion is the first of its kind in the nation. This isn't surprising, as parts of Nebraska are now known as “Silicon Prairie” because of the many financial technology companies in Lincoln and Omaha. McKeever explained that his firm has many clients who work in the blockchain or bitcoin sectors.
He doesn't think that other states will likely issue their own opinions about whether attorneys can accept bitcoins, but may rely on the Nebraska opinion. Other states that also use similar Rules of Professional Conduct may use the Nebraska opinion as a guideline for their own legal activities, McKeever explained.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllTrending Stories
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250