Note to Law Students: Consider a Career in Privacy Law
A panel at George Washington University Law School will discuss new opportunities for law school graduates and their own work in privacy law.
October 03, 2017 at 12:28 PM
3 minute read
|
Law schools eager to help their graduates navigate a competitive job market are increasingly pointing students toward practice areas involving technology.
In alignment with this trend, the George Washington University Alumni Association's Programs Subcommittee is set to host a panel for current and recent graduates of the George Washington University Law School encouraging students to take a step into data privacy practices.
The panel, “Getting Stated in Privacy Law,” will be hosted by Howard Reissner, CEO of e-discovery group Planet Data, and will feature four panelists: Debra Bromson, assistant general counsel at AAA Club Alliance; Margaret Gloecke, vice president of privacy and compliance counsel at A+E Networks; Ashley Slavik, senior counsel and data protection officer at Veeva Systems Inc.; and Laura Schmidt, associate at White and Williams.
Howard Reissner.“We're in a very challenging time now for recent grads in law. It's a rough market out there,” Reissner told LTN. Especially given the prominence and frequency of major data breaches at technology, financial and health care organizations, Reissner said that privacy law may provide a core competency for an increasing number of emerging legal practitioners.
“We think you could not today have a more timely topic that every recent grad should be able be at least conversant on,” he said.
Bromson, who started her career in IT contracting law and worked her way into privacy law through the pharmaceutical industry, said there isn't just one way to this practice area.
“There's a lot of ways to do this. All law schools now have classes in this area,” she said. Even if a particular law school doesn't have particularly strong privacy and data curriculum, many core issues in data privacy can be self-taught. “So many law firms have released information, so you could just do some research on it and watch it. So much of the law is now online.”
Outside of simply developing a legal niche, Bromson identified some key benefits of working in the data privacy space. “Given the exposure of and use of personal information and confidential information in all areas of a business, one of the best things about privacy law and one of the attractions to me was the ability to work with a wide range of customers in lots of different areas of your business. You really develop a true understanding of the business,” Bromson said.
There are a few “juicy topics” Bromson saw for potential legal work. The impending start date for the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) in the EU, she said, is likely to beef up companies' need to assess and comply, creating some potential opportunities for new privacy attorneys. Additionally, the growth of internet of things (IoT) applications in both commercial and enterprise applications may present exciting opportunities for newer attorneys in the space.
Bromson also noted that working on data breach response is likely to be a growing area for new privacy attorneys. “If they're going to a law firm, outside counsel has a key role in data breaches to be able to protect legal privacy,” Bromson added.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllTrending Stories
- 1The Tech Built by Law Firms in 2024
- 2Distressed M&A: Mass Torts, Bankruptcy and Furthering the Search for Consensus: Another Purdue Decision
- 3For Safer Traffic Stops, Replace Paper Documents With ‘Contactless’ Tech
- 4As Second Trump Administration Approaches, Businesses Brace for Sweeping Changes to Immigration Policy
- 5General Warrants and ESI
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250