Bryan Cave's TechX 'Incubates' Firm Attorneys, Not Technology
The firm's technology incubator this week announced its first deal in licensing Microsystems' Contract Companion tool.
October 11, 2017 at 10:17 AM
3 minute read
A number of large law firms have now launched various technology incubator programs, promising legal mentorship and often financial resources to burgeoning legal technology startups in an effort to support the development of emerging innovation. Dentons, Baker, Donelson, Bearman, Caldwell & Berkowitz and Allen & Overy are among the big firms who have established these programs at their firms.
Bryan Cave's TechX program, which launched initially last February, is a different kind of incubator. Instead of “incubating” various technology companies in the legal sector, TechX is looking to bolster the firm's own attorneys in understanding and shepherding in new technology innovation to its core infrastructure. The firm announced this week its first major technology licensing agreement through the TechX incubator with Contract Companion, Microsystems' contract drafting tool.
Katie DeBord, chief innovation officer for Bryan Cave, said the TechX team, notably its transactional attorney participants, saw a lot of value in Contract Companion's software in handling a frustrating but necessary task for contract drafting. “It was just an easy technology for attorneys to use and like. It didn't take a lot of training, it didn't require them to log into a separate system, and it solved a very common problem.”
At least 35 of the firm's transactional attorneys piloted the tool, which uses artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning to scan draft contracts for initial concerns.
DeBord said the TechX program is more broadly intended to help the firm's attorneys get a better sense of how law firms can and should choose the technology they use. “It was really my effort and the firm's effort to get our technology-forward attorneys, our tech-interested attorneys, involved in technology evaluation,” she explained.
Technology acquisition for a large law firm is not an easy proposition, DeBord noted. She explained that creating “an added layer on the infrastructure,” ultimately “can be both positive but have unintended consequences. There needs to be a lot of thought that goes into what we're doing.”
Contract Companion's use of AI infrastructure is one of its more attractive features on paper, but DeBord said that part of the power of a program such as TechX is helping the firm's attorneys get a better grasp of what AI could mean for their work, and how it may fit together with other important kinds of technology.
“That's part of the reason we formed TechX, to have this understanding,” DeBord said. “As attorneys understand AI and how it can augment their practice, they learn to appreciate data in a different way. They appreciate why it's important to have a rigorous knowledge management system so that they can collect and use that data later on.”
“People think it's just an instantaneous solution that is just going to obviate the need for lawyers today. Giving [attorneys] the ability to learn through a practical interface what it is and why it matters, and envision how that could impact their practice over time, I think is a really important thing to do,” DeBord added.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllTrending Stories
- 1Gibson Dunn Sued By Crypto Client After Lateral Hire Causes Conflict of Interest
- 2Trump's Solicitor General Expected to 'Flip' Prelogar's Positions at Supreme Court
- 3Pharmacy Lawyers See Promise in NY Regulator's Curbs on PBM Industry
- 4Outgoing USPTO Director Kathi Vidal: ‘We All Want the Country to Be in a Better Place’
- 5Supreme Court Will Review Constitutionality Of FCC's Universal Service Fund
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250