Bryan Cave's TechX 'Incubates' Firm Attorneys, Not Technology
The firm's technology incubator this week announced its first deal in licensing Microsystems' Contract Companion tool.
October 11, 2017 at 10:17 AM
3 minute read
A number of large law firms have now launched various technology incubator programs, promising legal mentorship and often financial resources to burgeoning legal technology startups in an effort to support the development of emerging innovation. Dentons, Baker, Donelson, Bearman, Caldwell & Berkowitz and Allen & Overy are among the big firms who have established these programs at their firms.
Bryan Cave's TechX program, which launched initially last February, is a different kind of incubator. Instead of “incubating” various technology companies in the legal sector, TechX is looking to bolster the firm's own attorneys in understanding and shepherding in new technology innovation to its core infrastructure. The firm announced this week its first major technology licensing agreement through the TechX incubator with Contract Companion, Microsystems' contract drafting tool.
Katie DeBord, chief innovation officer for Bryan Cave, said the TechX team, notably its transactional attorney participants, saw a lot of value in Contract Companion's software in handling a frustrating but necessary task for contract drafting. “It was just an easy technology for attorneys to use and like. It didn't take a lot of training, it didn't require them to log into a separate system, and it solved a very common problem.”
At least 35 of the firm's transactional attorneys piloted the tool, which uses artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning to scan draft contracts for initial concerns.
DeBord said the TechX program is more broadly intended to help the firm's attorneys get a better sense of how law firms can and should choose the technology they use. “It was really my effort and the firm's effort to get our technology-forward attorneys, our tech-interested attorneys, involved in technology evaluation,” she explained.
Technology acquisition for a large law firm is not an easy proposition, DeBord noted. She explained that creating “an added layer on the infrastructure,” ultimately “can be both positive but have unintended consequences. There needs to be a lot of thought that goes into what we're doing.”
Contract Companion's use of AI infrastructure is one of its more attractive features on paper, but DeBord said that part of the power of a program such as TechX is helping the firm's attorneys get a better grasp of what AI could mean for their work, and how it may fit together with other important kinds of technology.
“That's part of the reason we formed TechX, to have this understanding,” DeBord said. “As attorneys understand AI and how it can augment their practice, they learn to appreciate data in a different way. They appreciate why it's important to have a rigorous knowledge management system so that they can collect and use that data later on.”
“People think it's just an instantaneous solution that is just going to obviate the need for lawyers today. Giving [attorneys] the ability to learn through a practical interface what it is and why it matters, and envision how that could impact their practice over time, I think is a really important thing to do,” DeBord added.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllTrending Stories
- 1Law Firms Expand Scope of Immigration Expertise, Amid Blitz of Trump Orders
- 2Latest Boutique Combination in Florida Continues Am Law 200 Merger Activity
- 3Sarno da Costa D’Aniello Maceri LLC Announces Addition of New Office in Eatontown, NJ, and Named Partner
- 4Friday Newspaper
- 5Public Notices/Calendars
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250