New Morrison & Foerster Website Hopes to 'Scale Up' Startup Practice
The new website, ScaleUp, may signal a return to a trend among law firms to provide more online educational resources.
October 12, 2017 at 10:55 AM
3 minute read
Morrison & Foerster this week launched a specific website, ScaleUp, for the firm's startup practice. The website features information about the firm's practice in this space, as well as a set of articles and resources authored by both firm attorneys and others in the startup community.
John Rafferty, a partner in Morrison & Foerster's San Francisco office, explained that the website aims to be both a landing page for the firm's work with startups and a hub for information startup entrepreneurs can use to bolster their work.
“We really wanted to devote a separate website to our startup practice that really focused on the type of work we do and the lawyers in that practice, but more importantly as a resource that could be used by founders looking to build up their ventures,” Rafferty said.
The website's “Guidance” section provides information broken up into five separate categories: formation, funding, expansion, intellectual property, and exits. Rafferty explained that these subcategories and the content therein are “designed to address or talk about issues that a startup founder might have or face as they are forming or expanding their companies.”
Law firm websites tend to have a few standard features, most of which center on a firm directory that clients can search to get in touch with attorneys. When law firms first began to publish websites for their firms and practices, they often included lots of educational resources, guides, and other online content, but many firms have scaled back that practice due to the cost of updating and maintaining those resources.
Some law firms, however, seem to be dipping a toe back into this practice. Kilpatrick Townsend & Stockton this week launched a website, LitSmart E-discovery, as an accompanying online resource for its new LitSmart E-discovery Review Center. Cleary Gottlieb Steen & Hamilton similarly launched its “Cleary Cybersecurity and Privacy Watch” blog last week, featuring articles from firm attorneys on global policy and legislation affecting data breach and cybersecurity law.
ScaleUp may differ in that its intended readers, startup founders, tend to be fairly accustomed to seeing and interacting with highly developed websites as a first point of contact. Rafferty noted that there is a strong likelihood that “their first touch point with the firm is going to be the website.”
Notably, the ScaleUp website differs in design from Morrison & Foerster's main website. While the main Morrison & Foerster site is set against a black and white color scheme with many of the same features of other Big Law websites, ScaleUp is designed around a colorful rock climbing motif.
In light of the role that websites now play in establishing a potential business relationship, especially in the technology community, ScaleUp's different look is a way for the firm's startup practice to set a tone with potential clients. “This is something we're going to point clients or potential clients to going forward as the research to start looking at as they're starting to move forward,” Rafferty said.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllTrending Stories
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250