Bloomberg Law Brings AI to Research in 'Points of Law'
The new platform relies on AI to find and connect highlighted legal language throughout the millions of federal and state court opinions in Bloomberg's database.
October 16, 2017 at 03:18 PM
4 minute read
Whether building an argument for a case or investigating applicable regulatory statues for a client, legal's need for robust research capabilities has often driven technology adoption. And with the increasing application of artificial intelligence (AI), such research capabilities have been expanded to new heights of accuracy and specificity.
Now, the demand for legal technology providers is to help attorneys access all pertinent information as quickly and seamlessly as possible. Bloomberg Law recently sought to meet these expectations with the addition of its new subscription tool Bloomberg Points of Law. The tool leverages AI to give attorneys easier access to case law research, and allow them to understand it on a larger scale. Here's a look at the platform:
What it is: Bloomberg Points of Law is a case research platform that uses AI and data visualization to help attorneys, legal researchers and litigators highlight pertinent legal language, such as new case law or interpretations of a statute, within federal and state court opinions. It also allows users to find such legal language, which it deems “points of law,” across all court opinions in its database.
Darby Green, commercial product director for Litigation Solutions at Bloomberg BNA, explained that when scanning court opinions, the platform is trained to ignore things like its “background information and the facts,” while bringing “to the forefront those sentences and phrases that include things like 'black letter law', or elements of a particular case of action, or tests for providing a certain level of guilt or innocence, those types of facets.”
How it works: Users can search for points of law through a keyword search or through the platform's citation map, which Scott Mozarsky, president of Bloomberg Law, explained was a visual chronological representation of all cases that contain a selected point of law.
“You can see this visualization effectively as a timeline,” he said, noting that the aim of this visualization was to enable attorneys to “find cases that they wouldn't have normally found before.”
In addition to this citation map, the platform also offers raw data on each point of law's prominence within its court opinion database.
When a user highlights a point of law within a court opinion or a keyword search, for example, the platform will show certain statistical information about that highlighted language, including the number of other cases it appears in, the jurisdiction and location of courts where those cases were filed, and the case that most cited the language.
Under the Hood: Mozarsky explained that Bloomberg Points of Law connects with Bloomberg's proprietary database of “13 million published and unpublished state and federal opinions, which grows everyday by a few thousand decisions.”
Leveraging machine learning, the platform was trained by Bloomberg to identify pertinent points of law within these court opinions. The whole training process, Green noted, was no small feat. “This has been a four year endeavor, with a team of data scientists, and a team of data engineers.”
Today, however, the platform has found about “a million points of law” within the database, Mozarsky said, adding that he expects that number to grow as the platform becomes better at recognizing pertinent language within opinions.
Competition: Bloomberg's Ponts of Law joins an already crowded marketplace of similar legal research platforms.
Casetext, for example, uses machine learning to analyze briefs and other legal documents to find relevant material that covers the same legal precedents or language. Likewise, platforms like ROSS Intelligence and LexisNexis rely on IBM's AI-engine Watson to provide similar relevancy searches and capabilities within their own proprietary research platforms.
Suffice to say, employing AI in legal research is nothing new. So how does Bloomberg believe its new entry stands out?
For Mozarsky, it's all about the big picture. He noted that while the legal research space is crowded, “the reality is that what Bloomberg offers is very different than what some of these niche players offer.”
Bloomberg Points of Law, he explained, is but one part of the Bloomberg Law solution, which includes legal research, business development, and litigation analytics capabilities, among others.
Mozarsky said that Bloomberg is responding to a market demand with Bloomberg Points of Law, “but were are providing so much more above that.” With the addition of this new platform to Bloomberg Law, “it's a complete solution and that's why we feel so confident.”
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllTrending Stories
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250