Bucking M&A Trend, HaystackID Completes Recapitalization to Expand E-discovery Services
The recapitalization will allow the company to offer review services and become an end-to-end e-discovery provider.
October 19, 2017 at 11:01 AM
3 minute read
Over the past year, the e-discovery market has been defined by a flurry of M&A activity. But not all players in the market want to march to the same tune. E-discovery and forensics provider HaystackID recently announced a fairly rare move: a recapitalization that allows it to remain independent while growing the company.
The recapitalization, which was completed in October 2017, was funded by a group of mostly undisclosed private investors and lenders, though the Chicago-based Knox Capital was named as one of the lenders and new shareholders. Under the recapitalization, Kevin Glass, president and chief executive officer, will remain the majority shareholder and owner of the company.
Alex Gregor, founder and partner of Knox Capital, said HaystackID was a good investment because it “has carved out a great niche for white glove service” in the e-discovery space, and “there is always going to be room in this industry for a high level of customer service.”
He added that HaystackID has an opportunity to excel in the market segment serving “certain types of customers with complex issues that demand a higher level of service, and that's where Haystack is going to stay. And as long as you stay there, there is a much higher value proposition if you look at scaling, doubling or tripling your size.”
But recapitalization wasn't HaystackID's first plan. In a bid to expand its services to include e-discovery review, HaystackID initially “explored a complete buy out” from larger competitors looking for acquisitions, Glass noted. But in the end, “we kept coming back to, pound for pound we may be smaller, but we're a better company.”
HaystackID came out of acquisition discussions believing it had better clients, and handled more newsworthy cases, than most of its larger competitors. What's more, when HaystackID approached its clients to ask whether there was interest in the company managing their e-discovery review, many were receptive.
The company wasted little time getting its e-discovery review operations up and running. The service was launched “a couple months ago,” Glass said, noting that so far, HaystackID has “gotten large projects right out of the gate” and has been able to steadily build out its e-discovery review team and infrastructure.
With its managed review service, he added, the company looks to be receptive to how its client want review, whether through the deployment of technology, extra in-house staffing, or outsourced operations.
With the addition of e-discovery review, HaystackID joins the ranks of “end-to-end” e-discovery providers able to offer services that cover the full Electronic Discovery Reference Model (EDRM) cycle.
Glass said that such services are in high demand in the e-discovery space because clients prefer to have a single team throughout an entire e-discovery project to help direct efforts and “keep costs down.”
In addition to the expansion of its services, HaystackID has also used the recapitalization as an opportunity to instill a culture of self-ownership within the company. Glass plans to make HaystackID “an employee owned company,” by creating “equity plan for employees” that will roll out in the near future. The idea, he said, was to make sure employees feel they are a part of the company, and to attract new talent to HaystackID.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllTrending Stories
- 1Don’t Blow It: 10 Lessons From 10 Years of Nonprofit Whistleblower Policies
- 2AIAs: A Look At the Future of AI-Related Contracts
- 3Litigators of the Week: A $630M Antitrust Settlement for Automotive Software Vendors—$140M More Than Alleged Overcharges
- 4Litigator of the Week Runners-Up and Shout-Outs
- 5Linklaters Hires Four Partners From Patterson Belknap
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250