Bucking M&A Trend, HaystackID Completes Recapitalization to Expand E-discovery Services
The recapitalization will allow the company to offer review services and become an end-to-end e-discovery provider.
October 19, 2017 at 11:01 AM
3 minute read
Over the past year, the e-discovery market has been defined by a flurry of M&A activity. But not all players in the market want to march to the same tune. E-discovery and forensics provider HaystackID recently announced a fairly rare move: a recapitalization that allows it to remain independent while growing the company.
The recapitalization, which was completed in October 2017, was funded by a group of mostly undisclosed private investors and lenders, though the Chicago-based Knox Capital was named as one of the lenders and new shareholders. Under the recapitalization, Kevin Glass, president and chief executive officer, will remain the majority shareholder and owner of the company.
Alex Gregor, founder and partner of Knox Capital, said HaystackID was a good investment because it “has carved out a great niche for white glove service” in the e-discovery space, and “there is always going to be room in this industry for a high level of customer service.”
He added that HaystackID has an opportunity to excel in the market segment serving “certain types of customers with complex issues that demand a higher level of service, and that's where Haystack is going to stay. And as long as you stay there, there is a much higher value proposition if you look at scaling, doubling or tripling your size.”
But recapitalization wasn't HaystackID's first plan. In a bid to expand its services to include e-discovery review, HaystackID initially “explored a complete buy out” from larger competitors looking for acquisitions, Glass noted. But in the end, “we kept coming back to, pound for pound we may be smaller, but we're a better company.”
HaystackID came out of acquisition discussions believing it had better clients, and handled more newsworthy cases, than most of its larger competitors. What's more, when HaystackID approached its clients to ask whether there was interest in the company managing their e-discovery review, many were receptive.
The company wasted little time getting its e-discovery review operations up and running. The service was launched “a couple months ago,” Glass said, noting that so far, HaystackID has “gotten large projects right out of the gate” and has been able to steadily build out its e-discovery review team and infrastructure.
With its managed review service, he added, the company looks to be receptive to how its client want review, whether through the deployment of technology, extra in-house staffing, or outsourced operations.
With the addition of e-discovery review, HaystackID joins the ranks of “end-to-end” e-discovery providers able to offer services that cover the full Electronic Discovery Reference Model (EDRM) cycle.
Glass said that such services are in high demand in the e-discovery space because clients prefer to have a single team throughout an entire e-discovery project to help direct efforts and “keep costs down.”
In addition to the expansion of its services, HaystackID has also used the recapitalization as an opportunity to instill a culture of self-ownership within the company. Glass plans to make HaystackID “an employee owned company,” by creating “equity plan for employees” that will roll out in the near future. The idea, he said, was to make sure employees feel they are a part of the company, and to attract new talent to HaystackID.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllTrending Stories
- 1Gibson Dunn Sued By Crypto Client After Lateral Hire Causes Conflict of Interest
- 2Trump's Solicitor General Expected to 'Flip' Prelogar's Positions at Supreme Court
- 3Pharmacy Lawyers See Promise in NY Regulator's Curbs on PBM Industry
- 4Outgoing USPTO Director Kathi Vidal: ‘We All Want the Country to Be in a Better Place’
- 5Supreme Court Will Review Constitutionality Of FCC's Universal Service Fund
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250