You Might Have Mobile Device Management, But Data Flow Remains a Risk
A new report from Wandera reveals that securing employee mobile devices requires a balancing act between security protocols and mobility needs.
October 20, 2017 at 08:00 AM
4 minute read
Law firm technology operates over a core tension between cybersecurity safeguards and mobility needs. Firm attorneys are increasingly expected to be working and available outside of the office, but with the increasing onslaught of high-profile cyber breaches are also more concerned than ever about the need to protect data from hackers.
A new report from mobile security company Wandera found that one in six law firms don't have any enterprise mobility management platform in place; 75 percent of those that do use one of three platforms: MobileIron, AirWatch or a BlackBerry product. But even with a mobile management platform in place, the report notes, firm mobile devices may continue to be risk-prone.
Joel Windels, Wandera's vice president of marketing, said while mobile management platforms tend to control the functioning of a given device—what apps can be downloaded, what apps should be blocked, and what system tethering tends to be in place—they can often lack a sense of the data flow to and from that device.
“This report was focused a bit more on what's happening in the data, what's going on. It's a huge blind spot in a lot of the organizations,” he said.
Data flow to mobile devices has increased significantly in recent years. By Windels' estimation, over half of business web traffic is accessed via mobile device. The report additionally finds that the volume of data used per device has gone up nearly 84 percent annually.
Windels noted that given the added pressure on employees to stay available on their mobile devices, some of the lines around personal and business devices can get blurred for employees. While law firms spend a great deal of time trying to secure their office technology, some of those protocols and policies can go out the window once employees are out of the office. “As soon as someone leaves the office, there's no controls, [the firm has] no idea what's going on. Lawyers and partners are using them as if they're personal devices,” he said.
The report found that a typical 100-person law firm experiences around 14 attempts to access adult, gambling or “extreme” web content per day. Because of these sites' lax standards around personal data handling, malware or phishing links, accessing this content can put sensitive firm data held on mobile devices at serious risk of breach.
With the Global Data Protection Regulation set to take effect next May, Windels said many firms are now in that “panic stage,” with many scrambling to figure out how they can secure employee mobile devices from these threats and comply appropriately with the looming regulation.
“Now, law firms have a responsibility to be the first to know,” Windels said of the GDPR's application to data breaches. “Another part of the legislation is that if a breach does occur, it's on the IT team to show that they took reasonable measure to prevent it from happening,” he added, noting that having no plan of action with regards to mobile devices may leave companies exposed to the steep penalties that could be imposed under the regulation.
Windels acknowledged that mobile phones are not exactly the easiest to secure. Because many smartphones have roots in the consumer market, they create something of a conundrum for businesses to control and secure. One thing businesses can do, however, is put a platform in place to get a sense of what kind of data is flowing to and from mobile devices, which can theoretically help identify a potential problem before it gets too unwieldy. “You want a warning system that allows you to go investigate,” he said.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllTrending Stories
- 1Gibson Dunn Sued By Crypto Client After Lateral Hire Causes Conflict of Interest
- 2Trump's Solicitor General Expected to 'Flip' Prelogar's Positions at Supreme Court
- 3Pharmacy Lawyers See Promise in NY Regulator's Curbs on PBM Industry
- 4Outgoing USPTO Director Kathi Vidal: ‘We All Want the Country to Be in a Better Place’
- 5Supreme Court Will Review Constitutionality Of FCC's Universal Service Fund
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250