Focus on Cybersecurity in M&As Grows, With AI Companies Driving Activity
A MoFo survey found a growing awareness of cybersecurity due diligence as more companies look to acquire or merge with data-heavy targets.
October 23, 2017 at 08:00 AM
8 minute read
Sergio Delle Vedove/Shutterstock.com |
The 2016 revelation that Yahoo suffered a breach affecting 500 user million accounts was a wake up call for merger and acquisitions (M&A) professionals everywhere. The company, after all, disclosed the incident just as a deal was pending for its acquisition by Verizon.
While the acquisition ultimately went through, the breach still led to resignation of Yahoo's then-general counsel Ron Bell. In October 2017, Verizon disclosed that as many as three billion Yahoo accounts were also affected by an August 2013 incident as well.
For M&A professionals, the risks of not thoroughly investigating a target company's cybersecurity health are clear. And, according to a recent survey, most practitioners are paying heed to the warnings.
Conducted among 142 executives, investment bankers, attorneys and venture capitalists that work within M&A, Morrison & Foerster's 2017 M&A Leaders survey found that over the past year, focus among these professionals on cybersecurity due diligence has increased, with 82 percent placing increased emphasis on cybersecurity practices and standards at target companies.
And while this level remains unchanged from the MoFo's 2016 M&A Leaders Survey, Robert Townsend, co-chair of MoFo's Global M&A Practice Group, said there was actually a growing awareness of cybersecurity year-over-year.
“In the survey, the same number of respondents noted a heightened focus on cybersecurity in the prior year. The best way to interpret that is that 82 percent of respondents are saying cyber is an even higher focus than it was the prior year. It is a continuous trend of growing concern.”
“Not only is the concern greater, but we are seeing more deals not going through or failing because of cybersecurity and privacy issues,” added Christine Lyon, a partner at MoFo who focuses on data handling and protection issues. “The trend is very much toward this being a growing issue in deals.”
The focus on cybersecurity in M&A comes as interest in acquiring or merging with growing technology providers and companies, particularly those that deal in artificial intelligence, is expected to grow. When asked what emerging technologies would drive M&A activity over the next three years, 60 percent of respondents cited AI, while 25 percent said internet-of-things (IoT), and 10 percent cited blockchain.
Given that companies with AI and other advanced technology offerings usually store and process large volumes of data, they not only have more total data that can be stolen by bad actors, but their activities may also likely to fall under the purview of data protection regulations like the EU's upcoming General Data Protection regulation (GDPR), among others.
Lyon therefore noted that in managing such M&A deals, it's important to “really understand what the laws are, and what measures have been taken to comply with all the laws around the world, particularly those concerning information about individuals.”
Sergio Delle Vedove/Shutterstock.com |
The 2016 revelation that Yahoo suffered a breach affecting 500 user million accounts was a wake up call for merger and acquisitions (M&A) professionals everywhere. The company, after all, disclosed the incident just as a deal was pending for its acquisition by Verizon.
While the acquisition ultimately went through, the breach still led to resignation of Yahoo's then-general counsel Ron Bell. In October 2017, Verizon disclosed that as many as three billion Yahoo accounts were also affected by an August 2013 incident as well.
For M&A professionals, the risks of not thoroughly investigating a target company's cybersecurity health are clear. And, according to a recent survey, most practitioners are paying heed to the warnings.
Conducted among 142 executives, investment bankers, attorneys and venture capitalists that work within M&A,
And while this level remains unchanged from the MoFo's 2016 M&A Leaders Survey, Robert Townsend, co-chair of MoFo's Global M&A Practice Group, said there was actually a growing awareness of cybersecurity year-over-year.
“In the survey, the same number of respondents noted a heightened focus on cybersecurity in the prior year. The best way to interpret that is that 82 percent of respondents are saying cyber is an even higher focus than it was the prior year. It is a continuous trend of growing concern.”
“Not only is the concern greater, but we are seeing more deals not going through or failing because of cybersecurity and privacy issues,” added Christine Lyon, a partner at MoFo who focuses on data handling and protection issues. “The trend is very much toward this being a growing issue in deals.”
The focus on cybersecurity in M&A comes as interest in acquiring or merging with growing technology providers and companies, particularly those that deal in artificial intelligence, is expected to grow. When asked what emerging technologies would drive M&A activity over the next three years, 60 percent of respondents cited AI, while 25 percent said internet-of-things (IoT), and 10 percent cited blockchain.
Given that companies with AI and other advanced technology offerings usually store and process large volumes of data, they not only have more total data that can be stolen by bad actors, but their activities may also likely to fall under the purview of data protection regulations like the EU's upcoming General Data Protection regulation (GDPR), among others.
Lyon therefore noted that in managing such M&A deals, it's important to “really understand what the laws are, and what measures have been taken to comply with all the laws around the world, particularly those concerning information about individuals.”
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllTrending Stories
- 1Recent Decisions Regarding the Telephone Consumer Protection Act
- 2The Tech Built by Law Firms in 2024
- 3Distressed M&A: Mass Torts, Bankruptcy and Furthering the Search for Consensus: Another Purdue Decision
- 4For Safer Traffic Stops, Replace Paper Documents With ‘Contactless’ Tech
- 5As Second Trump Administration Approaches, Businesses Brace for Sweeping Changes to Immigration Policy
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250