Florida Bar Foundation Takes AI to the Justice Gap
The Pensacola-based pilot project found that applying predictive modeling to integrated intake systems could help nonprofit groups diagnose potential legal issues.
October 24, 2017 at 12:12 PM
7 minute read
Access to justice initiatives are a major talking point among legal practitioners and technologists, but efforts thus far haven't managed to slow the increasing gap between legal help and underserved communities.
The Escambia Project, a co-sponsored initiative of the Florida Bar Foundation, Legal Services of North Florida, and social services nonprofit Pathways for Change, found that integrated systems can be a huge asset in helping people identify their legal issues and get connected with assistance. The project established a channel between Pathways and LSNF's intake systems, allowing Pathways to push any potential legal needs over to legal aid attorneys who can assist.
Melissa Moss, deputy director for the FBF, explained that the foundation in 2008 paid to standardize the client intake systems used by Florida's legal service organizations. “It was probably the most prescient thing we've ever done,” she said. “Just having everyone on the same case management system is absolutely critical and really what enabled this.”
The project drew data from a series of small pilot projects across community service providers in the area using LegalServer, a web-based case management system used in legal service organizations across Florida. The project's Smart Intake tool applies predictive modeling and artificial intelligence to this data so that social service providers can use typical intake questions or a written narrative to gauge whether a client was likely struggling with a potential legal problem. Those results then get pushed directly over to that client's local legal assistance organization to conduct its own intake system.
Leslie Powell-Boudreaux, executive director of LSNF, explained that the Smart Intake tool can help nonprofit groups without specific legal expertise flag potential legal concerns sooner, which may give legal advocates a better chance of dealing with them.
Moss explained that the Pensacola-based project was inspired in part by Margaret Hagan, director of the Legal Design Lab at Stanford Law School's Center for the Legal Profession. Hagan facilitated a 2015 statewide summit funded by the Florida Bar Foundation for legal aid attorneys and staff about participatory design thinking, which calls for stakeholders to be involved in the design and implementation of technology. Escambia County, where Pensacola is located, volunteered to act as a kind of community laboratory in trying to implement some of these design principles.
The Escambia Project helped the FBF identify other areas for potential intervention. To help other nonprofits connect their work to legal resources without having to use LegalServer, the bar foundation hopes to develop a portal to help nonprofits run predictive models on their own intake systems. Looking further ahead, Moss hopes that these predictive models can be used on client's language directly.
“The big dream here really is to at some point get to the natural language part, where instead of doing a very static intake for a database, you can have someone tell their story, and you can ask leading questions, and that the key words are picked up and you can do all kinds of predictions on that,” Moss explained.
These next projects are big and expensive. While the bar foundation is hoping to find partnerships and funding that will allow it to begin work developing these portals, applying natural language processing to more unstructured client intake meetings would likely take big corporate resources.
“I think you're going to have to talk about a bigger partnership, that's really going to have to be about a Microsoft or a Google or someone like that,” Moss said.
For now, the Escambia Project is hoping that building evidence around these methods could bring in some greater funding and partnerships down the road. “We're working on the 'if we build it, they will come' premise,” Moss noted.
Access to justice initiatives are a major talking point among legal practitioners and technologists, but efforts thus far haven't managed to slow the increasing gap between legal help and underserved communities.
The Escambia Project, a co-sponsored initiative of the Florida Bar Foundation, Legal Services of North Florida, and social services nonprofit Pathways for Change, found that integrated systems can be a huge asset in helping people identify their legal issues and get connected with assistance. The project established a channel between Pathways and LSNF's intake systems, allowing Pathways to push any potential legal needs over to legal aid attorneys who can assist.
Melissa Moss, deputy director for the FBF, explained that the foundation in 2008 paid to standardize the client intake systems used by Florida's legal service organizations. “It was probably the most prescient thing we've ever done,” she said. “Just having everyone on the same case management system is absolutely critical and really what enabled this.”
The project drew data from a series of small pilot projects across community service providers in the area using LegalServer, a web-based case management system used in legal service organizations across Florida. The project's Smart Intake tool applies predictive modeling and artificial intelligence to this data so that social service providers can use typical intake questions or a written narrative to gauge whether a client was likely struggling with a potential legal problem. Those results then get pushed directly over to that client's local legal assistance organization to conduct its own intake system.
Leslie Powell-Boudreaux, executive director of LSNF, explained that the Smart Intake tool can help nonprofit groups without specific legal expertise flag potential legal concerns sooner, which may give legal advocates a better chance of dealing with them.
Moss explained that the Pensacola-based project was inspired in part by Margaret Hagan, director of the Legal Design Lab at
The Escambia Project helped the FBF identify other areas for potential intervention. To help other nonprofits connect their work to legal resources without having to use LegalServer, the bar foundation hopes to develop a portal to help nonprofits run predictive models on their own intake systems. Looking further ahead, Moss hopes that these predictive models can be used on client's language directly.
“The big dream here really is to at some point get to the natural language part, where instead of doing a very static intake for a database, you can have someone tell their story, and you can ask leading questions, and that the key words are picked up and you can do all kinds of predictions on that,” Moss explained.
These next projects are big and expensive. While the bar foundation is hoping to find partnerships and funding that will allow it to begin work developing these portals, applying natural language processing to more unstructured client intake meetings would likely take big corporate resources.
“I think you're going to have to talk about a bigger partnership, that's really going to have to be about a
For now, the Escambia Project is hoping that building evidence around these methods could bring in some greater funding and partnerships down the road. “We're working on the 'if we build it, they will come' premise,” Moss noted.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllTrending Stories
- 1Gibson Dunn Sued By Crypto Client After Lateral Hire Causes Conflict of Interest
- 2Trump's Solicitor General Expected to 'Flip' Prelogar's Positions at Supreme Court
- 3Pharmacy Lawyers See Promise in NY Regulator's Curbs on PBM Industry
- 4Outgoing USPTO Director Kathi Vidal: ‘We All Want the Country to Be in a Better Place’
- 5Supreme Court Will Review Constitutionality Of FCC's Universal Service Fund
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250