LexisNexis 'Authorized Hosting Program' Underscores Law Firm Cloud Caution
The company announced that Uptime will be the first participant in the program, which will put cloud providers through a rigorous vetting and approval process.
October 25, 2017 at 08:00 AM
6 minute read
For legal professionals, cloud services represent an inexpensive, agile way to access data and work on the go. But for legal technology providers, moving their offerings to the cloud is no easy task, as while there are many cloud providers to partner with, picking the right one can involve its fair share of vetting.
For LexisNexis, this meant launching an Authorized Hosting Program to allow select cloud providers to host it's Time Matters case and document management software and its PCLaw billing and accounting software. Scott Wallingford, vice president and general manager of Law Firm Software Solutions at LexisNexis, noted that to become a program partner, cloud service providers have to go through a rigorous vetting process and meet a long list of criteria, in order to ensure they meet the security, compliance and operational demands of the company's law firm clients.
“They need to have data centers located in the continental U.S. And when you think about support staff, we are looking for minimal levels of full-time technical support staff so that when a customer has a challenge, it's handled quite quickly,” he said.
LexisNexis will then consider whether such providers have a help desk process and metrics to track their servers' performance, as well as mandate a “high level of security that is continuously invested in” and an infrastructure that can handle their client's needs. If the cloud provider meets LexisNexis' standards, they can then become an authorized provider of Time Matters and PCLaw.
“When we think about bringing on a cloud provider, we are looking at people that have lots and lots of well-established market-grade capabilities. This is not two guys in a garage with a couple of servers,” Wallingford said.
Uptime Practice, a private cloud hosting provider serving the law firm market, was announced as LexisNexis' first fully vetted and approved partner of the program. But it will be far from the only cloud provider the company uses.
“We will add more partners to this over time, but they will be meeting the same extensive thresholds that we expected and worked through with Uptime,” Wallingford said.
Asked why LexisNexis looked to host its Time Matters and PCLaw solutions on the cloud, Wallingford explained the move was driven by small and medium law firms' struggles “to keep up with the rapidly evolving IT standards, whether it's picking servers, managing networks, plugging in additional programs, updating software, etc.”
“Sometimes, at law firms, the lawyer is also the IT specialist, and they would much rather spend time with their clients practicing law than they would having to struggle with server settings,” he said.
In addition to being able to outsource IT management, Wallingford also noted that cloud deployments will give law firms better data recovery protection, a key factor this year given the spate of natural disasters experienced in the U.S. “When you think about our recent spate of hurricanes, they disrupted a lot of law firms and their access to data,” he said.
For legal professionals, cloud services represent an inexpensive, agile way to access data and work on the go. But for legal technology providers, moving their offerings to the cloud is no easy task, as while there are many cloud providers to partner with, picking the right one can involve its fair share of vetting.
For
“They need to have data centers located in the continental U.S. And when you think about support staff, we are looking for minimal levels of full-time technical support staff so that when a customer has a challenge, it's handled quite quickly,” he said.
“When we think about bringing on a cloud provider, we are looking at people that have lots and lots of well-established market-grade capabilities. This is not two guys in a garage with a couple of servers,” Wallingford said.
Uptime Practice, a private cloud hosting provider serving the law firm market, was announced as
“We will add more partners to this over time, but they will be meeting the same extensive thresholds that we expected and worked through with Uptime,” Wallingford said.
Asked why
“Sometimes, at law firms, the lawyer is also the IT specialist, and they would much rather spend time with their clients practicing law than they would having to struggle with server settings,” he said.
In addition to being able to outsource IT management, Wallingford also noted that cloud deployments will give law firms better data recovery protection, a key factor this year given the spate of natural disasters experienced in the U.S. “When you think about our recent spate of hurricanes, they disrupted a lot of law firms and their access to data,” he said.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllTrending Stories
- 1Judge Denies Sean Combs Third Bail Bid, Citing Community Safety
- 2Republican FTC Commissioner: 'The Time for Rulemaking by the Biden-Harris FTC Is Over'
- 3NY Appellate Panel Cites Student's Disciplinary History While Sending Negligence Claim Against School District to Trial
- 4A Meta DIG and Its Nvidia Implications
- 5Deception or Coercion? California Supreme Court Grants Review in Jailhouse Confession Case
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250