Interstate Regulatory Alignment: Keys To The Self-Driving Car?
Foley & Lardner's new report finds that 85 percent of market leaders see connected cars and autonomous vehicles disrupting regular supply chains and regulations in the auto industry.
November 02, 2017 at 12:33 PM
8 minute read
GM's self-driving car. |
Autonomous vehicles and connected cars are sure to shake the foundations of commerce. And, according to the results of a new survey, that impact looks likely to put regulations in the throes as well.
Law firm Foley & Lardner this week released its “2017 Connected Cars & Autonomous Vehicles Survey” looking at both sensor-laden “connected cars” that can read and interact their environment and “autonomous vehicles,” better known as self-driving cars. Polling 83 executives from the technology, automotive and vendor-supplier industries, the survey identified regulatory changes that will likely be important in developing the connected cars and autonomous vehicle industry. Despite most regulatory action at the state level, 62 percent of those polled sought nationally consistent rules from the U.S. Department of Transportation around tech-enabled vehicles.
“Right now, some of the regulation is happening at the state level. Most of it has been in the way of testing, enabling on-road testing where you don't necessarily have to have a driver if you satisfy the different requirements,” said Steve Hilfinger, co-chair of Foley's manufacturing industry team and partner in the Detroit office.
This year alone, 33 states have proposed legislation around self-driving cars, noted the website for the National Council of State Legislators. At present, 21 states have adopted regulations around autonomous vehicles. Hilfinger noted that with an interstate highway system, it will likely be difficult for the tech-enabled auto industry to deal with state-level regulatory differences.
“It'd be very difficult to have a patchwork of 50 different state laws. I think you're going to see some federalization and rulemaking by the [National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA)],” he said.
Indeed, NHTSA this week announced it would seek industry input around the regulatory issues hindering autonomous vehicle development. The agency report noted that it hoped to identify “unnecessary regulatory barriers” to autonomous vehicle development.
That's not to say that states don't have a regulatory voice for their residents. “The states will still have roles to play in terms of their laws and operators of vehicles. I think there will be shared regulation by the federal government and the states. I think the states will ultimately focus more on safe operation,” Hilfinger said.
But the disruption from tech-enabled cars extends beyond regulations. Eighty-five percent of those polled in the Foley survey saw tech-enabled cars disrupting traditional supply chains in the market. And this disruption, Hilfinger pointed out, comes from some unlikely industry partnerships. “There will be new forms of collaboration, nontraditional partners. You have technology firms coming and contracting with automotive firms in new ways,” he said.
These collaborations have already gotten underway. “You're seeing more and more investments in companies, sometimes outright acquisitions in tech companies,” Hilfinger said. “That will help the companies and the industry accelerate their tech development and bring on a management team.” Last week, for example, Delphi Automotive acquired Boston-based autonomous vehicle startup nuTonomy in a $450 million deal.
“They're learning from each other,” Hilfinger said of the tech and automotive industries, noting that Michigan's automotive industry and Silicon Valley's technology entrepreneurship are increasingly adopting bigger stakes in one another's environments. “You need both, and you need a lot of talent within your company to make this work. You can hire the talent, you can acquire the talent, you can invest in a joint ventures,” he said.
GM's self-driving car. |
Autonomous vehicles and connected cars are sure to shake the foundations of commerce. And, according to the results of a new survey, that impact looks likely to put regulations in the throes as well.
Law firm
“Right now, some of the regulation is happening at the state level. Most of it has been in the way of testing, enabling on-road testing where you don't necessarily have to have a driver if you satisfy the different requirements,” said Steve Hilfinger, co-chair of Foley's manufacturing industry team and partner in the Detroit office.
This year alone, 33 states have proposed legislation around self-driving cars, noted the website for the National Council of State Legislators. At present, 21 states have adopted regulations around autonomous vehicles. Hilfinger noted that with an interstate highway system, it will likely be difficult for the tech-enabled auto industry to deal with state-level regulatory differences.
“It'd be very difficult to have a patchwork of 50 different state laws. I think you're going to see some federalization and rulemaking by the [National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA)],” he said.
Indeed, NHTSA this week announced it would seek industry input around the regulatory issues hindering autonomous vehicle development. The agency report noted that it hoped to identify “unnecessary regulatory barriers” to autonomous vehicle development.
That's not to say that states don't have a regulatory voice for their residents. “The states will still have roles to play in terms of their laws and operators of vehicles. I think there will be shared regulation by the federal government and the states. I think the states will ultimately focus more on safe operation,” Hilfinger said.
But the disruption from tech-enabled cars extends beyond regulations. Eighty-five percent of those polled in the Foley survey saw tech-enabled cars disrupting traditional supply chains in the market. And this disruption, Hilfinger pointed out, comes from some unlikely industry partnerships. “There will be new forms of collaboration, nontraditional partners. You have technology firms coming and contracting with automotive firms in new ways,” he said.
These collaborations have already gotten underway. “You're seeing more and more investments in companies, sometimes outright acquisitions in tech companies,” Hilfinger said. “That will help the companies and the industry accelerate their tech development and bring on a management team.” Last week, for example, Delphi Automotive acquired Boston-based autonomous vehicle startup nuTonomy in a $450 million deal.
“They're learning from each other,” Hilfinger said of the tech and automotive industries, noting that Michigan's automotive industry and Silicon Valley's technology entrepreneurship are increasingly adopting bigger stakes in one another's environments. “You need both, and you need a lot of talent within your company to make this work. You can hire the talent, you can acquire the talent, you can invest in a joint ventures,” he said.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllTrending Stories
- 1Judge Denies Sean Combs Third Bail Bid, Citing Community Safety
- 2Republican FTC Commissioner: 'The Time for Rulemaking by the Biden-Harris FTC Is Over'
- 3NY Appellate Panel Cites Student's Disciplinary History While Sending Negligence Claim Against School District to Trial
- 4A Meta DIG and Its Nvidia Implications
- 5Deception or Coercion? California Supreme Court Grants Review in Jailhouse Confession Case
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250