Axiom's Take on the GDPR Compliance Conundrum
Axiom's new GDPR Contracts Compliance Solution (CCS) hopes to prove that alternative legal services can cut through some of the expense around GDPR compliance.
November 09, 2017 at 10:00 AM
6 minute read
The May 2018 enforcement date for the EU's Global Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) has companies scrambling to prepare their information governance processes and procedures. Alternative legal services provider Axiom is hoping some of these companies will look to some nontraditional compliance approaches to meet the regulation's requirements.
This week, Axiom launched its GDPR Contracts Compliance Solution (CCS), a service for organizations' contract remediation needs. Using technology with artificial intelligence-based infrastructure, the service identifies priority areas in contract databases per GDPR requirements, drafts and sends addenda to counterparties updating contract terms, and offers a streamlined workflow management for negotiation.
Mathew Lewis, senior vice president and co-head of Axiom's Global Banking Practice, explained that companies have largely failed to address the size and scope of the contract work they expect to deal with before GDPR's enforcement date.
“Too often, companies overlook contract remediation entirely, view the work as something that can be handled in-house by existing team members or rolled up into a larger response,” Lewis said. “We have found that this approach severely underestimates the complexity of the task at hand.”
More broadly, Lewis sees a space for alternative legal services in helping organizations drill deeper into some of the remaining areas of GDPR compliance they may need to address before May, which can be cheaper and quicker than employing consultants to review broader GDPR compliance.
“The beauty of alternative legal services is that it allows our clients to quickly scale up a team of experts focused on the specific regulation, and provides a laser-focused way to target often overlooked elements that clients would otherwise leave until too late,” Lewis said.
Some organizations remain wary of alternative legal services. Lisa Hart Shephard, CEO of legal market research group Acritas, previously told The American Lawyer that traditional law firms are generally still “the preferred option” for in-house counsel. Yet Axiom is hoping that its technology and services around it will help the company stand apart from outside counsel options.
Building services around an AI-based technological infrastructure is an increasingly common technology strategy for dealing with complex contract analysis. Lewis noted that while AI can boost the speed and accuracy of contract work, both of which can lend a huge hand to companies in GDPR compliance, the technology is perhaps best at helping organizations figure out where to focus their efforts.
“AI alone will not be enough to become GDPR-compliant, but it's an important part of scoping and prioritizing agreements so that you can tackle the problem intelligently,” Lewis noted.
The May 2018 enforcement date for the EU's Global Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) has companies scrambling to prepare their information governance processes and procedures. Alternative legal services provider Axiom is hoping some of these companies will look to some nontraditional compliance approaches to meet the regulation's requirements.
This week, Axiom launched its GDPR Contracts Compliance Solution (CCS), a service for organizations' contract remediation needs. Using technology with artificial intelligence-based infrastructure, the service identifies priority areas in contract databases per GDPR requirements, drafts and sends addenda to counterparties updating contract terms, and offers a streamlined workflow management for negotiation.
Mathew
“Too often, companies overlook contract remediation entirely, view the work as something that can be handled in-house by existing team members or rolled up into a larger response,”
More broadly,
“The beauty of alternative legal services is that it allows our clients to quickly scale up a team of experts focused on the specific regulation, and provides a laser-focused way to target often overlooked elements that clients would otherwise leave until too late,”
Some organizations remain wary of alternative legal services. Lisa Hart Shephard, CEO of legal market research group Acritas, previously told The American Lawyer that traditional law firms are generally still “the preferred option” for in-house counsel. Yet Axiom is hoping that its technology and services around it will help the company stand apart from outside counsel options.
Building services around an AI-based technological infrastructure is an increasingly common technology strategy for dealing with complex contract analysis.
“AI alone will not be enough to become GDPR-compliant, but it's an important part of scoping and prioritizing agreements so that you can tackle the problem intelligently,”
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllTrending Stories
- 1Call for Nominations: Elite Trial Lawyers 2025
- 2Senate Judiciary Dems Release Report on Supreme Court Ethics
- 3Senate Confirms Last 2 of Biden's California Judicial Nominees
- 4Morrison & Foerster Doles Out Year-End and Special Bonuses, Raises Base Compensation for Associates
- 5Tom Girardi to Surrender to Federal Authorities on Jan. 7
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250