K1 Investments to Merge Smarsh and Actiance
The decision comes after K1 recently acquired Actiance in a bid to help the company finance growth related to its large finance clients.
November 15, 2017 at 09:01 AM
4 minute read
Private equity group K1 Investment Management today acquired communications archiving and retention organization Actiance, and announced it would combine the organization with fellow archiving service Smarsh following regulatory approval. K1 bought equity in Smarsh two years ago.
For the time being, both Actiance and Smarsh will continue to operate independently, but both companies plan to consider how they'll merge their C-suite executives, teams and operations in coming months.
K1 Investment Management recently made a similar play with three of its other legal technology portfolio companies, investing $100 million in a combined business enterprise among drafting management companies Litéra, Microsystems XRef and The Sackett Group.
Kailash Ambwani, CEO of Actiance, explained that following the release of Actiance's cloud-based archive system Alcatraz, the company was approached by enough large financial sector clients that management needed to reconsider its structure for a larger client base.
“We felt we needed more financial flexibility to pursue the opportunity,” Ambwani noted. After meeting with a number of potential equity investors, the company settled on K1 Investments.
Stephen Marsh, CEO of Smarsh, explained that Actiance and Smarsh have run roughly parallel operations in the market for quite some time. “We've had very complementary business operating in a similar market, selling our services to similar customers for 15 years or so,” he said, noting that this hasn't always been quite the case. The two companies started at roughly opposite ends of the market, with Actiance focusing most of its early efforts on large, multinational organizations, while Smarsh got its start serving smaller enterprises.
At this point, Marsh sees the two companies serving the same target base of large financial and government clients. “I think our vision is shared. I think those are going to be a big source of growth,” he said.
Stephen Marsh, CEO of SmarshAmbwani noted that although Smarsh and Actiance have served a similar market for quite some time, the two companies have relied on mostly complementary, rather than competing, technologies. Smarsh's recent investments in mobile-based records retention, like the company's acquisition of audio data storage group Cognia, pair well with Actiance's focus on less well-established but increasingly popular social media communications channels like WeChat and WhatsApp.
“There's actually surprisingly little overlap between the two product lines. Even where we do have common customers, the customers will typically be using different products from each of our portfolios,” he said.
Although the two companies are still deciding on their plan for a more unified operation, Ambwani said both Smarsh and Actiance are focused on hitting their pre-established growth goals for the year and ensuring that customers don't notice the change.
“The key point is that from our customers' perspective, they will not see a change. In the intermediary, we'll continue to operate as two companies. It's very important to not disrupt that growth,” he said.
Marsh noted that this may be the “most significant” merger deal in the archiving and records retention space, but that the market is no stranger to M&As. That said, startups in the space offering coverage for just a few different communication channels are likely to see an increasingly uphill battle for longevity in the market. “It'll be really difficult to survive as a single point archiving solution provider no matter what the use case is,” he said.
“Organizations want all their communications in one place. There's far less benefit in having fragmented archiving solutions, especially when more and more offices are hoping from one communications tool to another,” Marsh added.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllTrending Stories
- 1'It's Not Going to Be Pretty': PayPal, Capital One Face Novel Class Actions Over 'Poaching' Commissions Owed Influencers
- 211th Circuit Rejects Trump's Emergency Request as DOJ Prepares to Release Special Counsel's Final Report
- 3Supreme Court Takes Up Challenge to ACA Task Force
- 4'Tragedy of Unspeakable Proportions:' Could Edison, DWP, Face Lawsuits Over LA Wildfires?
- 5Meta Pulls Plug on DEI Programs
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250